Peer review anew: Three principles and a case study in postpublication quality assurance

Christopher M. Kelty, C. Sidney Burrus, Richard G. Baraniuk

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Over the last 15 years, the Internet has enabled new modes of authorship, new forms of open licensing and distribution, and new forms of collaboration and peer production to flourish. But in turn, new anxieties have arisen, especially concerning quality assurance, peer review, reuse, and modification. New innovations are appearing in peer review, endorsement, the measurement of trust, and the understanding of reputation, but without any systematic analysis of the general principles of quality assurance and peer review in this new era. In this paper, we propose a general set of principles for understanding what peer review was in the past and how it should be applied today to different kinds of content and in new platforms for managing quality. The principles stress an analysis not only on the content in materials but also on their context of use. Our focus is on open educational resources, and we present a case study of the open education project Connexions' lens system for quality assurance and review. However, the principles can be applied across multiple levels of knowledge production, including scholarship in engineering and science and reference materials in addition to educational publishing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number4527088
Pages (from-to)1000-1011
Number of pages12
JournalProceedings of the IEEE
Volume96
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008

Keywords

  • Connexions
  • Lens
  • Open access
  • Open educational resource (OER)
  • Peer review
  • Quality assurance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Peer review anew: Three principles and a case study in postpublication quality assurance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this