TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient-Reported Outcomes After Chemoradiation in Patients With Anal Cancer
T2 - A Qualitative Analysis
AU - Corrigan, Kelsey L.
AU - De, Brian
AU - Rooney, Michael K.
AU - Ludmir, Ethan B.
AU - Das, Prajnan
AU - Smith, Grace L.
AU - Taniguchi, Cullen M.
AU - Minsky, Bruce D.
AU - Koay, Eugene J.
AU - Koong, Albert C.
AU - Holliday, Emma B.
N1 - Funding Information:
Sources of support: This study was supported in part by the Cancer Center Support Grant (National Cancer Institute grant P30 CA016672) as well as philanthropic funds.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/7/1
Y1 - 2022/7/1
N2 - Purpose: Pelvic chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is the curative therapy for non-metastatic anal cancer, resulting in excellent survival rates. However, anal cancer survivors may experience diminished quality of life (QOL) due to late toxicities from pelvic CRT. Few studies use patient-reported QOL, and few include thematic analyses of the patient experience in their own words. We conducted a survey study with qualitative analysis of free-text responses to explore themes of patient perceptions of their QOL during and after pelvic CRT to inform future interventions, reform patient education, and improve outcomes. Methods and Materials: We surveyed 248 patients with anal cancer treated with definitive intensity modulated radiation and concurrent chemotherapy from 2010 to 2018 who were alive and without recurrence. The survey included the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General 7 item version, questions about satisfaction with preparation and patient education, and an optional free-text response question. Survey free response data were analyzed using the constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Representative themes were generated. Results: One-hundred and twelve patients (45%) completed surveys. Of these respondents, 84 (75%) answered the free-text question. The median (interquartile range) Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General 7 item version score for survey responders (N = 112) was 21 (range, 15-24). Three themes most mentioned by respondents were persistent toxicity effecting QOL (82%), insufficient upfront information about CRT (56%), and gratitude toward care received (35%). Conclusions: Patients described late toxicities that affect QOL after pelvic CRT for anal cancer. This may be partially due to insufficient preparative information and post-treatment support. This study contributes to the literature supporting improved patient education and side effect management to augment long-term QOL for survivors of anal cancer.
AB - Purpose: Pelvic chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is the curative therapy for non-metastatic anal cancer, resulting in excellent survival rates. However, anal cancer survivors may experience diminished quality of life (QOL) due to late toxicities from pelvic CRT. Few studies use patient-reported QOL, and few include thematic analyses of the patient experience in their own words. We conducted a survey study with qualitative analysis of free-text responses to explore themes of patient perceptions of their QOL during and after pelvic CRT to inform future interventions, reform patient education, and improve outcomes. Methods and Materials: We surveyed 248 patients with anal cancer treated with definitive intensity modulated radiation and concurrent chemotherapy from 2010 to 2018 who were alive and without recurrence. The survey included the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General 7 item version, questions about satisfaction with preparation and patient education, and an optional free-text response question. Survey free response data were analyzed using the constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Representative themes were generated. Results: One-hundred and twelve patients (45%) completed surveys. Of these respondents, 84 (75%) answered the free-text question. The median (interquartile range) Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General 7 item version score for survey responders (N = 112) was 21 (range, 15-24). Three themes most mentioned by respondents were persistent toxicity effecting QOL (82%), insufficient upfront information about CRT (56%), and gratitude toward care received (35%). Conclusions: Patients described late toxicities that affect QOL after pelvic CRT for anal cancer. This may be partially due to insufficient preparative information and post-treatment support. This study contributes to the literature supporting improved patient education and side effect management to augment long-term QOL for survivors of anal cancer.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131097534&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131097534&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100986
DO - 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100986
M3 - Article
C2 - 35662810
AN - SCOPUS:85131097534
SN - 2452-1094
VL - 7
SP - 100986
JO - Advances in Radiation Oncology
JF - Advances in Radiation Oncology
IS - 4
M1 - 100986
ER -