TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Patient Activation
T2 - What Are Their Roles in Orthopedic Trauma?
AU - Grogan Moore, Meredith L.
AU - Jayakumar, Prakash
AU - Laverty, David
AU - Hill, Austin D.
AU - Koenig, Karl M.
PY - 2019/11/1
Y1 - 2019/11/1
N2 - Summary:The rise of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement across medicine has been swift and now extends to the world of orthopedic trauma. However, PRO measures (PROMs) applied to trauma patients pose special considerations; measuring "episodes of care" is less straightforward, injuries are heterogeneous in their severity, and the patient's initial visit is "postinjury." Obtaining baseline scores and assessing the impact of a traumatic event on mental health are key considerations. Currently, few, if any, trauma registries include PROs; though general and condition-specific PROMs plus the patient empowerment measure of Patient Activation represent meaningful inputs for the clinical decision-making process. To be useful in trauma care, PROMs should be psychometrically sound and validated, be used for capturing function, screen for mental state and substance use, and give the clinician a sense of the patient's "activation" (engagement in their own health). Although the implementation of routine PRO collection can seem daunting, clinicians can use a multitude of electronic resources to access validated measures and simplify the implementation process. Computer-adaptive testing has evolved to help minimize patient burden, and PROM collection must maximize efficiency. Once established as part of your practice, PROs become an important tool to track recovery, identify mental health issues, engage in the prevention of future injury, and enable care of the whole patient.
AB - Summary:The rise of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement across medicine has been swift and now extends to the world of orthopedic trauma. However, PRO measures (PROMs) applied to trauma patients pose special considerations; measuring "episodes of care" is less straightforward, injuries are heterogeneous in their severity, and the patient's initial visit is "postinjury." Obtaining baseline scores and assessing the impact of a traumatic event on mental health are key considerations. Currently, few, if any, trauma registries include PROs; though general and condition-specific PROMs plus the patient empowerment measure of Patient Activation represent meaningful inputs for the clinical decision-making process. To be useful in trauma care, PROMs should be psychometrically sound and validated, be used for capturing function, screen for mental state and substance use, and give the clinician a sense of the patient's "activation" (engagement in their own health). Although the implementation of routine PRO collection can seem daunting, clinicians can use a multitude of electronic resources to access validated measures and simplify the implementation process. Computer-adaptive testing has evolved to help minimize patient burden, and PROM collection must maximize efficiency. Once established as part of your practice, PROs become an important tool to track recovery, identify mental health issues, engage in the prevention of future injury, and enable care of the whole patient.
KW - functional outcomes after trauma
KW - mental health screening
KW - patient activation
KW - patient segmentation
KW - patient-reported outcome collection
KW - patient-reported outcome measurement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073101811&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073101811&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001612
DO - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001612
M3 - Article
C2 - 31596783
AN - SCOPUS:85073101811
VL - 33
SP - S38-S42
JO - Journal of orthopaedic trauma
JF - Journal of orthopaedic trauma
SN - 0890-5339
ER -