Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer

Edward F Patz, Paul Pinsky, Constantine Gatsonis, Jorean D Sicks, Barnett S Kramer, Martin C Tammemägi, Caroline Chiles, William C Black, Denise R Aberle, NLST Overdiagnosis Manuscript Writing Team, Reginald F. Munden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

434 Scopus citations

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Screening for lung cancer has the potential to reduce mortality, but in addition to detecting aggressive tumors, screening will also detect indolent tumors that otherwise may not cause clinical symptoms. These overdiagnosis cases represent an important potential harm of screening because they incur additional cost, anxiety, and morbidity associated with cancer treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate overdiagnosis in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We used data from the NLST, a randomized trial comparing screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) vs chest radiography (CXR) among 53 452 persons at high risk for lung cancer observed for 6.4 years, to estimate the excess number of lung cancers in the LDCT arm of the NLST compared with the CXR arm.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We calculated 2 measures of overdiagnosis: the probability that a lung cancer detected by screening with LDCT is an overdiagnosis (PS), defined as the excess lung cancers detected by LDCT divided by all lung cancers detected by screening in the LDCT arm; and the number of cases that were considered overdiagnosis relative to the number of persons needed to screen to prevent 1 death from lung cancer.

RESULTS: During follow-up, 1089 lung cancers were reported in the LDCT arm and 969 in the CXR arm of the NLST. The probability is 18.5% (95% CI, 5.4%-30.6%) that any lung cancer detected by screening with LDCT was an overdiagnosis, 22.5% (95% CI, 9.7%-34.3%) that a non-small cell lung cancer detected by LDCT was an overdiagnosis, and 78.9% (95% CI, 62.2%-93.5%) that a bronchioalveolar lung cancer detected by LDCT was an overdiagnosis. The number of cases of overdiagnosis found among the 320 participants who would need to be screened in the NLST to prevent 1 death from lung cancer was 1.38.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: More than 18% of all lung cancers detected by LDCT in the NLST seem to be indolent, and overdiagnosis should be considered when describing the risks of LDCT screening for lung cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)269-74
Number of pages6
JournalJAMA Internal Medicine
Volume174
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2014

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Diagnostic Errors
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Male
  • Mass Screening
  • Middle Aged
  • Probability
  • Prospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Survival Rate
  • Time Factors
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • United States

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this