Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Outcomes of Radiation Overlap and Margin Length in Intracoronary Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis

Chloe Kharsa, Devin Olek, Gal Sella, Mangesh Kritya, Joseph Elias, Muhammad Faraz Anwaar, Elia El Hajj, Albert E. Raizner, Bin Teh, Andrew Farach, Neal S. Kleiman, Alpesh Shah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a common complication following coronary stent implantation. Intracoronary brachytherapy (ICBT) has re-emerged as an effective treatment modality. However, optimal procedural strategies, including the role of radiation source overlap and adequate margin length, remain unclear. Aims: To evaluate the impact of radiation source overlap and radiation margin adequacy on procedural and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing ICBT for ISR. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of 222 patients treated with ICBT for ISR between June 2016 and December 2024. Patients were stratified using radiation source overlap (single vs. double dwell) and radiation margin length (< 10 vs. ≥ 10 mm). The primary endpoint was 1-year target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary endpoints included 1-year and 3-year all-cause mortality and 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Results: Among 222 patients (mean age 65.1 ± 0.7 years; 28.9% female), 42 (19.3%) received overlapping radiation, and 1616 (74.8%) had radiation margins ≥ 10 mm. TLR rates at 1 year were similar between overlap and non-overlap groups (HR = 1.26, 95% CI [0.68−2.31], p = 0.46). There were no significant differences in 1-year mortality (HR = 0.79; 95% CI [0.27–2.29]; p = 0.67) or 1-year MACE (HR = 1.17; 95% CI [0.66–2.10]; p = 0.59). Patients with margins ≥ 10 mm had similar rates of 1-year TLR compared to those with margins < 10 mm (HR = 0.61; 95% CI [0.16−2.30], p = 0.47). Both groups were associated with rates of 1-year mortality (HR = 0.73, 95% CI [0.33−1.60], p = 0.43) and 1-year MACE (HR = 0.98; 95% CI [0.63−1.53], p = 0.94). Conclusion: Radiation source overlap and short (< 10 mm) or extended (≥ 10 mm) treatment margins beyond the restenotic lesion do not compromise the safety or efficacy of ICBT. These findings support a more individualized, anatomy-guided approach to ICBT planning, which may enhance procedural feasibility without sacrificing long-term outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2870-2879
Number of pages10
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume106
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2025

Keywords

  • in-stent restenosis
  • intracoronary brachytherapy
  • overlapping radiation
  • radiation margin
  • target lesion revascularization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes of Radiation Overlap and Margin Length in Intracoronary Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this