TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis After Liver Transplantation
T2 - An Updated Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
AU - Yong, Jie Ning
AU - Lim, Wen Hui
AU - Ng, Cheng Han
AU - Tan, Darren Jun Hao
AU - Xiao, Jieling
AU - Tay, Phoebe Wen Lin
AU - Lin, Snow Yunni
AU - Syn, Nicholas
AU - Chew, Nicholas
AU - Nah, Benjamin
AU - Dan, Yock Young
AU - Huang, Daniel Q.
AU - Tan, Eunice Xiang Xuan
AU - Sanyal, Arun J.
AU - Noureddin, Mazen
AU - Siddiqui, Mohammad Shadab
AU - Muthiah, Mark D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 AGA Institute
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Background & Aims: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the fastest growing indication of liver transplantation (LT) and is projected to be the leading cause of LT in the near future. The systemic pathogenesis of NASH increases risks of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with NASH receiving LT. Thus, this study aimed to conduct a time-dependent survival analysis between LT recipients with and without NASH using hazard ratios. Methods: A search was conducted on Medline and Embase databases for articles relating to LT outcomes for NASH recipients. A survival analysis was conducted of hazard ratios using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model with meta-regression. To account for censoring, survival data were reconstructed from published Kaplan–Meier curves and pooled to derive more accurate hazard estimates and all-cause mortality in NASH patients after LT. Pairwise meta-analysis was conducted to analyze secondary outcomes. Results: Fifteen studies involving 119,327 LT recipients were included in our analysis with a prevalence of NASH of 20.2% (95% CI, 12.9–30.2). The pooled 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year all-cause mortality in NASH patients after LT were 12.5%, 24.4%, and 37.9%, respectively. Overall survival was comparable between LT recipients for NASH vs non-NASH (hazard ratio, 0.910; 95% CI, 0.760 to 1.10; P = .34). Meta-regression showed that a higher model for end-stage liver disease score was associated with significantly worse overall survival in NASH compared with non-NASH after LT (95% CI, -0.0856 to -0.0181; P = .0026). Conclusions: This study shows that patients undergoing LT for NASH cirrhosis have comparable complication rates, overall survival, and graft survival compared with non-NASH patients, although close monitoring may be indicated for those with higher model for end-stage liver disease scores.
AB - Background & Aims: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the fastest growing indication of liver transplantation (LT) and is projected to be the leading cause of LT in the near future. The systemic pathogenesis of NASH increases risks of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with NASH receiving LT. Thus, this study aimed to conduct a time-dependent survival analysis between LT recipients with and without NASH using hazard ratios. Methods: A search was conducted on Medline and Embase databases for articles relating to LT outcomes for NASH recipients. A survival analysis was conducted of hazard ratios using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model with meta-regression. To account for censoring, survival data were reconstructed from published Kaplan–Meier curves and pooled to derive more accurate hazard estimates and all-cause mortality in NASH patients after LT. Pairwise meta-analysis was conducted to analyze secondary outcomes. Results: Fifteen studies involving 119,327 LT recipients were included in our analysis with a prevalence of NASH of 20.2% (95% CI, 12.9–30.2). The pooled 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year all-cause mortality in NASH patients after LT were 12.5%, 24.4%, and 37.9%, respectively. Overall survival was comparable between LT recipients for NASH vs non-NASH (hazard ratio, 0.910; 95% CI, 0.760 to 1.10; P = .34). Meta-regression showed that a higher model for end-stage liver disease score was associated with significantly worse overall survival in NASH compared with non-NASH after LT (95% CI, -0.0856 to -0.0181; P = .0026). Conclusions: This study shows that patients undergoing LT for NASH cirrhosis have comparable complication rates, overall survival, and graft survival compared with non-NASH patients, although close monitoring may be indicated for those with higher model for end-stage liver disease scores.
KW - Liver Transplantation
KW - Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
KW - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
KW - Severity of Illness Index
KW - Humans
KW - Risk Factors
KW - End Stage Liver Disease/complications
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Liver Transplantation/adverse effects
KW - Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/complications
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121791923&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121791923&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.014
DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.014
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34801743
AN - SCOPUS:85121791923
SN - 1542-3565
VL - 21
SP - 45-54.e6
JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
IS - 1
ER -