TY - JOUR
T1 - Office probing for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in infants
AU - Miller, Aaron M.
AU - Chandler, Danielle L.
AU - Repka, Michael X.
AU - Hoover, Darren L.
AU - Lee, Katherine A.
AU - Melia, Michele
AU - Rychwalski, Paul J.
AU - Silbert, David I.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/2
Y1 - 2014/2
N2 - Purpose To determine whether demographic or clinical factors are associated with the outcome of office-based nasolacrimal duct probing for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). Methods In two multicenter prospective studies, 384 eyes of 304 children aged 6 to <15 months with NLDO underwent a nasolacrimal duct probing performed in the office using topical anesthesia. Treatment success, defined as no clinical signs of NLDO (epiphora, increased tear lake, or mucous discharge) and no reoperation, was assessed 1 month after probing in one study and 6 months after probing in the other study. Data from both studies were pooled to evaluate associations between baseline characteristics and treatment success. Results Office probing was successful in 75% of eyes overall (95% CI, 70%-80%). The procedure was less successful in eyes of children with bilateral NLDO compared with unilateral NLDO (63% vs 80%; relative risk = 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66-0.92]) and in eyes that had 2 or 3 clinical signs of NLDO compared with one (71% vs 83%; relative risk = 0.88 [95% CI, 0.81-0.96]). Treatment success did not appear to be related to age, specific clinical signs of NLDO, prior treatment, or research study. Conclusions Performing nasolacrimal duct probing in the office successfully treats NLDO in the majority of cases in children aged 6 to <15 months. The success rate is lower with bilateral disease or when more than one clinical sign of NLDO is present.
AB - Purpose To determine whether demographic or clinical factors are associated with the outcome of office-based nasolacrimal duct probing for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). Methods In two multicenter prospective studies, 384 eyes of 304 children aged 6 to <15 months with NLDO underwent a nasolacrimal duct probing performed in the office using topical anesthesia. Treatment success, defined as no clinical signs of NLDO (epiphora, increased tear lake, or mucous discharge) and no reoperation, was assessed 1 month after probing in one study and 6 months after probing in the other study. Data from both studies were pooled to evaluate associations between baseline characteristics and treatment success. Results Office probing was successful in 75% of eyes overall (95% CI, 70%-80%). The procedure was less successful in eyes of children with bilateral NLDO compared with unilateral NLDO (63% vs 80%; relative risk = 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66-0.92]) and in eyes that had 2 or 3 clinical signs of NLDO compared with one (71% vs 83%; relative risk = 0.88 [95% CI, 0.81-0.96]). Treatment success did not appear to be related to age, specific clinical signs of NLDO, prior treatment, or research study. Conclusions Performing nasolacrimal duct probing in the office successfully treats NLDO in the majority of cases in children aged 6 to <15 months. The success rate is lower with bilateral disease or when more than one clinical sign of NLDO is present.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894522104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894522104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.10.016
DO - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.10.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 24568978
AN - SCOPUS:84894522104
SN - 1091-8531
VL - 18
SP - 26
EP - 30
JO - Journal of AAPOS
JF - Journal of AAPOS
IS - 1
ER -