Noninferiority and equivalence designs: Issues and implications for mental health research

Carolyn J. Greene, Leslie A. Morland, Valerie L. Durkalski, B. Christopher Frueh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

121 Scopus citations

Abstract

The terms noninferiority and equivalence are often used interchangeably to refer to trials in which the primary objective is to show that a novel intervention is as effective as the standard intervention. The use of these designs is becoming increasingly relevant to mental health research. Despite the fundamental importance of these designs, they are often poorly understood, improperly applied and subsequently misinterpreted. In this article, the authors explain noninferiority and equivalence designs and key methodological and statistical considerations. Decision points in using these designs are discussed, such as choice of control condition, determination of the noninferiority margin, and calculation of sample size and power With increasing utilization of these designs, it is critical that researchers understand the methodological issues, advantages, disadvantages, and related challenges.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)433-439
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Traumatic Stress
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Noninferiority and equivalence designs: Issues and implications for mental health research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this