Multidisciplinary international expert consensus on perioperative airway management

Hengrui Liang, Guowei Che, Fei Cui, Junguo Dong, Weiquan Gu, Chundong Gu, Shun Xu, Yufeng Ba, Kaican Cai, Qingdong Cao, Chang Chen, Chun Chen, Qixun Chen, Liyang Cheng, Gang Feng, Yunjiu Gou, Wenwei Guo, Jinxi He, Junming He, Jian HuYing Huang, Wenxi Wang, Wenjie Jiao, Shunjun Jiang, Jun Liu, Lan Lan, Wei Li, Xiaofei Li, Zhongcheng Li, Yin Li, Zhu Liang, Hongxu Liu, Yingbin Liu, Xinyu Mei, Xicheng Song, Daqiang Sun, Hui Tian, Ziqiang Tian, Jianhua Wang, Guangsuo Wang, Xin Xu, Xudong Xiang, Guobing Xu, Tao Xue, Chao Yang, Xiaolong Yan, Nuo Yang, Feng Yao, Dalong Yin, Xiaochuan Yin, Bentong Yu, Wei Zhai, Yu Zhang, Guangjian Zhang, Xiaowen Zhang, Qiang Zhang, Yi Zhang, Jun Zhao, Haihui Zhong, Alessandro Brunelli, Till Ploenes, Luca Bertolaccini, John Kit Chung Tam, Min P. Kim, Majed Refai, Michel Gonzalez, Adam R. Dyas, Nicoletta Pia Ardò, Hiran C. Fernando, Giulio Maurizi, Gregor J. Kocher, Giuseppe Marulli, Álvaro Fuentes-Martín, Gianluca Perroni, Kyung Soo Kim, Maria Rodriguez, Marcus Taylor, Xusen Zou, Wei Wang, Jianxing He

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Perioperative airway management is critical for patient safety and optimal surgical outcomes. Effective airway management reduces postoperative pulmonary complications and accelerates recovery. This expert consensus aims to update the earlier consensus based on the latest research and emphasize aspects that were previously overlooked. Methods: A comprehensive search up to June 2024 was performed. Earlier consensus documents were reviewed to ensure thorough coverage. A modified Delphi method involved 62 domestic experts from various surgical and anesthetic specialties who discussed and voted on preliminary recommendations in face-to-face meetings, requiring ≥70% agreement. Drafts were then reviewed by 18 international experts via email to incorporate diverse insights. Results: Through the modified Delphi method, consensus was achieved with ≥70% agreement among the 62 domestic experts, ensuring that the preliminary recommendations were robust and widely supported. Additionally, feedback from the 18 international experts provided diverse insights that further refined and validated the recommendations. Recommendations were established for preoperative airway preparation, anesthesia management, surgical approach, postoperative airway management, and managing coexisting respiratory diseases. These recommendations update the perspectives of earlier consensus documents based on the latest research and emphasize non-intubated surgery, inhalation therapy, and individualized treatment for patients with coexisting pulmonary diseases. Conclusions: This expert consensus provides a valuable reference for clinical practice. Further technological optimization and clinical research are needed to improve perioperative airway management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1042-1060
Number of pages19
JournalTranslational Lung Cancer Research
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 30 2025

Keywords

  • Perioperative airway management
  • anesthesia
  • coexisting pulmonary disease
  • inhalation therapy
  • non-intubated surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multidisciplinary international expert consensus on perioperative airway management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this