TY - GEN
T1 - Model-based compressive sensing for signal ensembles
AU - Duarte, Marco F.
AU - Cevher, Volkan
AU - Baraniuk, Richard G.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Compressive sensing (CS) is an alternative to Shannon/Nyquist sampling for acquiring sparse or compressible signals. Instead of taking N periodic samples, we measure M ≪ N inner products with random vectors and then recover the signal via a sparsity-seeking optimization or greedy algorithm. A new framework for CS based on unions of subspaces can improve signal recovery by including dependencies between values and locations of the signal's significant coefficients. In this paper, we extend this framework to the acquisition of signal ensembles under a common sparse supports model. The new framework provides recovery algorithms with theoretical performance guarantees. Additionally, the framework scales naturally to large sensor networks: the number of measurements needed for each signal does not increase as the network becomes larger. Furthermore, the complexity of the recovery algorithm is only linear in the size of the network. We provide experimental results using synthetic and real-world signals that confirm these benefits.
AB - Compressive sensing (CS) is an alternative to Shannon/Nyquist sampling for acquiring sparse or compressible signals. Instead of taking N periodic samples, we measure M ≪ N inner products with random vectors and then recover the signal via a sparsity-seeking optimization or greedy algorithm. A new framework for CS based on unions of subspaces can improve signal recovery by including dependencies between values and locations of the signal's significant coefficients. In this paper, we extend this framework to the acquisition of signal ensembles under a common sparse supports model. The new framework provides recovery algorithms with theoretical performance guarantees. Additionally, the framework scales naturally to large sensor networks: the number of measurements needed for each signal does not increase as the network becomes larger. Furthermore, the complexity of the recovery algorithm is only linear in the size of the network. We provide experimental results using synthetic and real-world signals that confirm these benefits.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949618636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949618636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ALLERTON.2009.5394807
DO - 10.1109/ALLERTON.2009.5394807
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:77949618636
SN - 9781424458714
T3 - 2009 47th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton 2009
SP - 244
EP - 250
BT - 2009 47th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton 2009
T2 - 2009 47th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton 2009
Y2 - 30 September 2009 through 2 October 2009
ER -