Methodological Issues in Nutritional Epidemiology Research—Sorting Through the Confusion

Miguel Cainzos-Achirica, Usama Bilal, Karan Kapoor, Renato Quispe Ayala, John W. McEvoy, Manel Pladevall-Vila, Roger S. Blumenthal, Michael J. Blaha

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations


Purpose of Review: Our purpose was to discuss the methodological limitations of observational nutritional epidemiology research, using observational studies on coffee intake and health as a case example. Recent Findings: A number of recent observational studies on the potential health effects of daily coffee intake have reported protective associations between higher coffee intake and a variety of health outcomes, including death. This is inconsistent with the findings from classic studies showing an increased risk of coronary heart disease events, performed in young adults with a homogeneous education level, and adjusting for tobacco use. Summary: Many nutritional epidemiological studies have important limitations, which limit their validity. These include the use of prevalent user designs, risk of reverse causality, measurement error particularly of the exposure of interest, and residual confounding by socioeconomic status. In this review, we discuss these potential issues and provide constructive recommendations intended to help minimize them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number4
JournalCurrent Cardiovascular Risk Reports
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018


  • Bias
  • Coffee
  • Confounding
  • Epidemiologic methods
  • Nutritional epidemiology
  • Observational

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)


Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological Issues in Nutritional Epidemiology Research—Sorting Through the Confusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this