TY - JOUR
T1 - Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Surveillance
T2 - A Delphi Panel Consensus
AU - Alban, Juan
AU - Bowen, R. Christopher
AU - Reichstein, David A.
AU - McKean, Meredith
AU - Lutzky, Jose
AU - Weis, Ezekiel
AU - Carvajal, Richard D.
AU - Dulka, Susan
AU - Morse, Brian G.
AU - Butler, Marcus O.
AU - Rapisuwon, Suthee
AU - Kim, Kevin B.
AU - Chandrasekaran, Sanjay
AU - Warner, Allison Betof
AU - Zager, Jonathan S.
AU - Chmielowski, Bartosz
AU - Patel, Sapna P.
AU - Hernandez-Aya, Leonel Fernando
AU - Correa, Zelia M.
AU - Fecher, Leslie A.
AU - Najjar, Yana G.
AU - Montazeri, Kamaneh
AU - Shoushtari, Alexander N.
AU - Javed, Asad
AU - Gombos, Dan S.
AU - Salama, April K.S.
AU - Tsai, Katy
AU - Miller, Frank H.
AU - Khushalani, Nikhil
AU - Seedor, Rino S.
AU - Lipson, Evan J.
AU - Reddy, Sunil A.
AU - Buchbinder, Elizabeth
AU - Bhatia, Shailender
AU - Pavlick, Anna
AU - Mehmi, Inderjit
AU - Aaberg, Thomas
AU - Ikeguchi, Alexandra P.
AU - Kim, Ivana K.
AU - Walter, Scott D.
AU - Singh, Arun D.
AU - Sullivan, Ryan J.
AU - Choi, Jacob S.
AU - Williams, Basil K.
AU - Orloff, Marlana
AU - Mruthyunjaya, Prithvi
AU - Schollenberger, Megan D.
AU - Gandhi, Namita
AU - Harbour, J. William
AU - Chandra, Sunandana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/12/30
Y1 - 2025/12/30
N2 - Background/Objectives: Uveal melanoma is a rare but aggressive intraocular malignancy that metastasizes in up to half of patients, most commonly to the liver, despite effective local treatment. In the absence of robust evidence, there are no standardized guidelines for post-treatment surveillance, resulting in wide variation in imaging modalities, frequency, and duration across physicians and institutions. This study aimed to develop expert consensus recommendations for surveillance strategies in patients with uveal melanoma. Methods: A modified Delphi method was conducted across three iterative survey rounds between September 2024 and February 2025 using an online platform. Panelists included medical oncologists, ocular oncologists, radiologists, and surgical oncologists from North America. A multidisciplinary steering committee developed statements addressing risk-based surveillance using both molecular and clinical prognostic factors, including gene expression profiling (GEP) and PRAME status. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥70% of panelists rating a statement 7–9 on a 9-point Likert scale. Results: Forty-nine experts were invited, and 41 completed at least one survey round. The panel represented 17 U.S. states, Washington, D.C., and two Canadian provinces. Twelve statements reached stable consensus, including recommendations for imaging modality, frequency, and duration in intermediate- and high-risk patients. Although there was agreement that low-risk patients warrant surveillance, no consensus was reached on the optimal approach for this group. Conclusions: This is the first study to provide consensus-based guidance incorporating GEP and PRAME status into surveillance recommendations for uveal melanoma, offering a standardized framework to guide clinical practice and future research.
AB - Background/Objectives: Uveal melanoma is a rare but aggressive intraocular malignancy that metastasizes in up to half of patients, most commonly to the liver, despite effective local treatment. In the absence of robust evidence, there are no standardized guidelines for post-treatment surveillance, resulting in wide variation in imaging modalities, frequency, and duration across physicians and institutions. This study aimed to develop expert consensus recommendations for surveillance strategies in patients with uveal melanoma. Methods: A modified Delphi method was conducted across three iterative survey rounds between September 2024 and February 2025 using an online platform. Panelists included medical oncologists, ocular oncologists, radiologists, and surgical oncologists from North America. A multidisciplinary steering committee developed statements addressing risk-based surveillance using both molecular and clinical prognostic factors, including gene expression profiling (GEP) and PRAME status. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥70% of panelists rating a statement 7–9 on a 9-point Likert scale. Results: Forty-nine experts were invited, and 41 completed at least one survey round. The panel represented 17 U.S. states, Washington, D.C., and two Canadian provinces. Twelve statements reached stable consensus, including recommendations for imaging modality, frequency, and duration in intermediate- and high-risk patients. Although there was agreement that low-risk patients warrant surveillance, no consensus was reached on the optimal approach for this group. Conclusions: This is the first study to provide consensus-based guidance incorporating GEP and PRAME status into surveillance recommendations for uveal melanoma, offering a standardized framework to guide clinical practice and future research.
KW - PRAME
KW - gene-expression profile
KW - metastatic uveal melanoma surveillance
KW - uveal melanoma
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105027773783
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105027773783&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers18010121
DO - 10.3390/cancers18010121
M3 - Article
C2 - 41514630
AN - SCOPUS:105027773783
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 18
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 1
M1 - 121
ER -