MERLIN: Two-Year Results of Brolucizumab in Participants with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Persistent Retinal Fluid

David M. Brown, Glenn J. Jaffe, Charles C. Wykoff, Eser Adiguzel, Jeffrey S. Heier, Arshad M. Khanani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the safety and efficacy of brolucizumab (Beovu) 6 mg versus aflibercept (Eylea) 2 mg administered every 4 weeks in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and persistent retinal fluid after the week 52 up to week 104.

DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked phase 3a study.

PARTICIPANTS: Participants with recalcitrant nAMD (persistent residual retinal fluid despite previous frequent anti-VEGF treatment).

METHODS: Study eyes were randomized 2:1 to intravitreal brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg every 4 weeks for 100 weeks or until study termination.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All available efficacy (analysis of noninferiority in mean best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], central subfield thickness [CST], fluid-free status [no intraretinal fluid and no subretinal fluid]) and safety data up to study termination, including data up to week 104 for those participants who completed the study before its termination. All P values after week 52 were nominal and reflect observed data for the efficacy analyses.

RESULTS: Brolucizumab 6 mg every 4 weeks was noninferior to aflibercept 2 mg in mean BCVA change from baseline to week 104 (least squares mean difference, -0.4 ETDRS letters; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.7 to 3.0; P = 0.0169). The proportion of eyes with ≥15-letter loss was 6.2% for brolucizumab and 4.7% for aflibercept (P = 0.7762), and a greater proportion of eyes were fluid free at week 104 (52.5% brolucizumab vs. 28.2% aflibercept; 95% CI, 11.9-37.3; P < 0.001) in eyes treated with brolucizumab versus aflibercept. Incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI), including retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion, was 11.5% (0.8% and 2.2%) for brolucizumab versus 6.1% (0% and 0.6%) for aflibercept.

CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with 52-week results, brolucizumab 6 mg every 4 weeks was noninferior in mean BCVA change, with anatomic outcomes superior to aflibercept 2 mg every 4 weeks from baseline to week 104 or study termination. The incidence of IOI, including retinal vasculitis and retinal vascular occlusion, was higher with brolucizumab versus aflibercept; therefore, brolucizumab should not be used more frequently than every 8 weeks after the loading regimen.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-140
Number of pages10
JournalOphthalmology
Volume132
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2025

Keywords

  • BCVA
  • Brolucizumab
  • Intraretinal fluid
  • Subretinal fluid
  • Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/therapeutic use
  • Intravitreal Injections
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Tomography, Optical Coherence
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
  • Male
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Visual Acuity/physiology
  • Recombinant Fusion Proteins/therapeutic use
  • Wet Macular Degeneration/drug therapy
  • Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use
  • Subretinal Fluid
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Aged
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors
  • Fluorescein Angiography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'MERLIN: Two-Year Results of Brolucizumab in Participants with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Persistent Retinal Fluid'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this