TY - JOUR
T1 - Measurement of arterial activity on routine FDG PET/CT images improves prediction of risk of future CV events
AU - Figueroa, Amparo L.
AU - Abdelbaky, Amr
AU - Truong, Quynh A.
AU - Corsini, Erin
AU - MacNabb, Megan H.
AU - Lavender, Zachary R.
AU - Lawler, Meredith A.
AU - Grinspoon, Steven K.
AU - Brady, Thomas J.
AU - Nasir, Khurram
AU - Hoffmann, Udo
AU - Tawakol, Ahmed
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - Objectives This study sought to determine whether arterial inflammation measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) improves prediction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) beyond traditional risk factors. Background It is unknown whether arterial 18F-FDG uptake measured with routine PET imaging provides incremental value for predicting CVD events beyond Framingham risk score (FRS). Methods We consecutively identified 513 individuals from 6,088 patients who underwent 18F-FDG-PET and computed tomography (CT) imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital between 2005 and 2008 and who met additional inclusion criteria: ≥30 years of age, no prior CVD, and free of cancer. CVD events were independently adjudicated, while blinded to clinical data, using medical records to determine incident stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute coronary syndrome, revascularization, new-onset angina, peripheral arterial disease, heart failure, or CVD death. FDG uptake was measured in the ascending aorta (as target-to-background-ratio [TBR]), while blinded to clinical data. Results During follow-up (median 4.2 years), 44 participants developed CVD (2 per 100 person-years at risk). TBR strongly predicted subsequent CVD independent of traditional risk factors (hazard ratio: 4.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.98 to 11.2; p < 0.001) and (hazard ratio: 4.13; 95% CI: 1.59 to 10.76; p = 0.004) after further adjustment for coronary calcium score. Addition of arterial PET measurement to FRS scores improved the C-statistic (mean ± standard error 0.62 ± 0.03 vs. 0.66 ± 0.03). Further, incorporation of TBR into a model with FRS variables resulted in an integrated discrimination of 5% (95% CI: 0.36 to 9.87). Net reclassification improvements were 27.48% (95% CI: 16.27 to 39.92) and 22.3% (95% CI: 11.54 to 35.42) for the 10% and 6% intermediate-risk cut points, respectively. Moreover, TBR was inversely associated with the timing of CVD (beta -0.096; p < 0.0001). Conclusions Arterial FDG uptake, measured from routinely obtained PET/CT images, substantially improved incident CVD prediction beyond FRS among individuals undergoing cancer surveillance and provided information on the potential timing of such events.
AB - Objectives This study sought to determine whether arterial inflammation measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) improves prediction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) beyond traditional risk factors. Background It is unknown whether arterial 18F-FDG uptake measured with routine PET imaging provides incremental value for predicting CVD events beyond Framingham risk score (FRS). Methods We consecutively identified 513 individuals from 6,088 patients who underwent 18F-FDG-PET and computed tomography (CT) imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital between 2005 and 2008 and who met additional inclusion criteria: ≥30 years of age, no prior CVD, and free of cancer. CVD events were independently adjudicated, while blinded to clinical data, using medical records to determine incident stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute coronary syndrome, revascularization, new-onset angina, peripheral arterial disease, heart failure, or CVD death. FDG uptake was measured in the ascending aorta (as target-to-background-ratio [TBR]), while blinded to clinical data. Results During follow-up (median 4.2 years), 44 participants developed CVD (2 per 100 person-years at risk). TBR strongly predicted subsequent CVD independent of traditional risk factors (hazard ratio: 4.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.98 to 11.2; p < 0.001) and (hazard ratio: 4.13; 95% CI: 1.59 to 10.76; p = 0.004) after further adjustment for coronary calcium score. Addition of arterial PET measurement to FRS scores improved the C-statistic (mean ± standard error 0.62 ± 0.03 vs. 0.66 ± 0.03). Further, incorporation of TBR into a model with FRS variables resulted in an integrated discrimination of 5% (95% CI: 0.36 to 9.87). Net reclassification improvements were 27.48% (95% CI: 16.27 to 39.92) and 22.3% (95% CI: 11.54 to 35.42) for the 10% and 6% intermediate-risk cut points, respectively. Moreover, TBR was inversely associated with the timing of CVD (beta -0.096; p < 0.0001). Conclusions Arterial FDG uptake, measured from routinely obtained PET/CT images, substantially improved incident CVD prediction beyond FRS among individuals undergoing cancer surveillance and provided information on the potential timing of such events.
KW - FDG-PET
KW - cardiovascular events
KW - inflammation
KW - risk factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890256598&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890256598&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.08.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.08.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 24269261
AN - SCOPUS:84890256598
SN - 1936-878X
VL - 6
SP - 1250
EP - 1259
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
IS - 12
ER -