Meaningful use of electronic health records for quality assessment and review of clinical ethics consultation

Susan Sanelli-Russo, Kelly Mc Bride Folkers, William Sakolsky, Joseph Fins, Nancy Neveloff Dubler

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


Evolving practice requires peer review of clinical ethics (CE) consultation for quality assessment and improvement. Many institutions have identified the chart note as the basis for this process, but to our knowledge, electronic health record (EHR) systems are not necessarily designed to easily include CE consultation notes. This article provides a framework for the inclusion of CE consultation notes into the formal EHR, describing a developed system in the Epic EHR that allows for the elaborated electronic notation of the CE chart note. The implementation of the "meaningful use" criteria for EHR, mandated by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of 2009, requires that health professionals meet certain standards for quality, efficiency, and safety, all of which overlap with the goals of standardization, peer review, and quality improvement within CE consultation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-61
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Ethics
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018


  • Electronic Health Records
  • Ethics Consultation
  • Humans
  • Meaningful Use
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Quality Improvement
  • United States

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Meaningful use of electronic health records for quality assessment and review of clinical ethics consultation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this