Abstract
This article hypothesizes that while the principles of evidence-based practice should serve as a guiding ideal for physicians, the manner in which this practice style is commonly implemented may be insufficient to the provision of truly informed decision-making and consent - especially in cases where outcomes are inextricably tied to technique, such as in the surgical subspecialities. Specifically, current methods of 'shared decision making' fail to adequately incorporate patient-specific expectations and physician-specific outcomes. A 'next-step', aimed at matching such expectations with outcomes is suggested and a method for implementation is presented.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1287-1291 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Medical Hypotheses |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2007 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Matching patient-specific expectations with physician-specific outcomes: Towards transparency in treatment decision-making and consent'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS