TY - JOUR
T1 - Magnetic resonance imaging of blood flow with a phase subtraction technique
T2 - In vitro and in vivo validation
AU - Evans, Avery J.
AU - Iwai, Fumiharu
AU - Grist, Thomas A.
AU - Sostman, H. Dirk
AU - Hedlund, Laurence W.
AU - Spritzer, Charles E.
AU - Negro-Vilar, Rosa
AU - Beam, Craig A.
AU - Pelc, Norbert J.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1993/2
Y1 - 1993/2
N2 - RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. One promising approach to flow quantification uses the velocity-dependent phase change of moving protons. A velocity- encoding phase subtraction technique was used to measure the velocity and flow rate of fluid flow in a phantom and blood flow in volunteers. METHODS. In a model, the authors measured constant flow velocities from 0.1 to 270.0 cm/second with an accuracy (95% confidence intervals) of ±12.5 cm/second. There was a linear relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurement and the actual value (r2 = .99; P = .0001). RESULTS. Measuring mean pulsatile flow from 125 to 1,900 mL/minute, the accuracy of the MRI pulsatile flow measurements (95% confidence intervals) was ±70 mL/minute. There was a linear relationship between the MRI pulsatile flow measurement and the actual value (r2 = .99; P = .0001). In 10 normal volunteers, the authors tested the technique in vivo, quantitating flow rates in the pulmonary artery and the aorta. The average difference between the two measurements was 5%. In vivo carotid flow waveforms obtained with MRI agreed well with the shape of corresponding ultrasound Doppler waveforms. CONCLUSIONS. Velocity-encoding phase subtraction MRI bears potential clinical use for the evaluation of blood flow. Potential applications would be in the determination of arterial blood flow to parenchymal organs, the detection and quantification of intra- and extra-cardiac shunts, and the rapid determination of cardiac output and stroke volume.
AB - RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. One promising approach to flow quantification uses the velocity-dependent phase change of moving protons. A velocity- encoding phase subtraction technique was used to measure the velocity and flow rate of fluid flow in a phantom and blood flow in volunteers. METHODS. In a model, the authors measured constant flow velocities from 0.1 to 270.0 cm/second with an accuracy (95% confidence intervals) of ±12.5 cm/second. There was a linear relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurement and the actual value (r2 = .99; P = .0001). RESULTS. Measuring mean pulsatile flow from 125 to 1,900 mL/minute, the accuracy of the MRI pulsatile flow measurements (95% confidence intervals) was ±70 mL/minute. There was a linear relationship between the MRI pulsatile flow measurement and the actual value (r2 = .99; P = .0001). In 10 normal volunteers, the authors tested the technique in vivo, quantitating flow rates in the pulmonary artery and the aorta. The average difference between the two measurements was 5%. In vivo carotid flow waveforms obtained with MRI agreed well with the shape of corresponding ultrasound Doppler waveforms. CONCLUSIONS. Velocity-encoding phase subtraction MRI bears potential clinical use for the evaluation of blood flow. Potential applications would be in the determination of arterial blood flow to parenchymal organs, the detection and quantification of intra- and extra-cardiac shunts, and the rapid determination of cardiac output and stroke volume.
KW - Blood flow
KW - magnetic resonance imaging
KW - phase contrast imaging
KW - velocity measurement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027497819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027497819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00004424-199302000-00004
DO - 10.1097/00004424-199302000-00004
M3 - Article
C2 - 8444566
AN - SCOPUS:0027497819
SN - 0020-9996
VL - 28
SP - 109
EP - 115
JO - Investigative Radiology
JF - Investigative Radiology
IS - 2
ER -