Magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection after traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial

Nancy R. Temkin, Gail D. Anderson, H. Richard Winn, Richard G. Ellenbogen, Gavin W. Britz, James Schuster, Timothy Lucas, David W. Newell, Pamela Nelson Mansfield, Joan E. Machamer, Jason Barber, Sureyya S. Dikmen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

251 Scopus citations


Background: Traumatic brain injuries represent an important and costly health problem. Supplemental magnesium positively affects many of the processes involved in secondary injury after traumatic brain injury and consistently improves outcome in animal models. We aimed to test whether treatment with magnesium favourably affects outcome in head-injured patients. Methods: In a double-blind trial, 499 patients aged 14 years or older admitted to a level 1 regional trauma centre between August, 1998, and October, 2004, with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury were randomly assigned one of two doses of magnesium or placebo within 8 h of injury and continuing for 5 days. Magnesium doses were targeted to achieve serum magnesium ranges of 1·0-1·85 mmol/L or 1·25-2·5 mmol/L. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality, seizures, functional measures, and neuropsychological tests assessed up to 6 months after injury. Analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. This trial is registered with, number NCT00004730. Findings: Magnesium showed no significant positive effect on the composite primary outcome measure at the higher dose (mean=55 average percentile ranking on magnesium vs 52 on placebo, 95% CI for difference -7 to 14; p=0·70). Those randomly assigned magnesium at the lower dose did significantly worse than those assigned placebo (48 vs 54, 95% CI -10·5 to -2; p=0·007). Furthermore, there was higher mortality with the higher magnesium dose than with placebo. Other major medical complications were similar between groups, except for a slight excess of pulmonary oedema and respiratory failure in the lower magnesium target group. No subgroups were identified in which magnesium had a significantly positive effect. Interpretation: Continuous infusions of magnesium for 5 days given to patients within 8 h of moderate or severe traumatic brain injury were not neuroprotective and might even have a negative effect in the treatment of significant head injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-38
Number of pages10
JournalLancet Neurology
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology


Dive into the research topics of 'Magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection after traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this