TY - JOUR
T1 - Machine Learning Identification of Patient Phenoclusters in Aortic Regurgitation
AU - Malahfji, Maan
AU - Tan, Xin
AU - Kaolawanich, Yodying
AU - Saeed, Mujtaba
AU - Guta, Andrada
AU - Reardon, Michael J.
AU - Zoghbi, William A.
AU - Polsani, Venkateshwar
AU - Elliott, Michael
AU - Kim, Raymond
AU - Li, Meng
AU - Shah, Dipan J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/5
Y1 - 2025/5
N2 - Background: Current treatment paradigms assume aortic regurgitation (AR) patients to be a homogenous population, but varied courses of disease progression and outcomes are observed clinically. Objectives: The aim of this study was to first use unsupervised machine learning to identify unique patient phenoclusters in AR, and subsequently evaluate their prognostic relevance. Methods: Clinical and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) characterization of moderate or severe AR patients was performed across 4 U.S. centers. Data from 2 centers were used for derivation of phenoclusters and validation was performed in the other 2. The outcome was all-cause death. An unsupervised clustering pipeline, Partition Around Medoids, used 23 clinical and CMR variables to derive patient clusters independent of outcomes. Results: Included were 972 patients with mean age 62 ± 23.2 years, 754 (78%) male, 680 (70%) trileaflet valve, and 330 (34%) underwent valve surgery. Over a median follow-up of 2.58 years (Q1-Q3: 1.03-5.50 years), the overall mortality rate was 12%. Four clusters were derived: 1) a younger predominantly male phenotype with majority of bicuspid aortic valve and high extent of left ventricular (LV) remodeling (1% mortality); 2) older male patients with predominantly tricuspid valves and intermediate outcomes (10% mortality); 3) older predominantly male patients with the highest burden of comorbidities, LV scarring, and dysfunction (22% mortality); and 4) a phenotype of predominantly female patients with high mortality and relatively higher symptoms burden, relatively lower extent of LV remodeling, and rate of aortic valve replacement (20% mortality). The clustering algorithm was independently associated with survival after adjustment for time-dependent aortic valve replacement and traditional risk markers of prognosis in patients with AR (C statistic 0.77 vs 0.75; P = 0.009 in the validation cohort). Conclusions: Unique patient phenoclusters of AR are described using a machine learning approach leveraging comprehensive CMR and clinical characterization. This approach may be an opportunity for a precision medicine approach to enhance risk stratification of patients with AR. Female patients with AR pose a unique phenotype with high mortality, which deserves greater attention.
AB - Background: Current treatment paradigms assume aortic regurgitation (AR) patients to be a homogenous population, but varied courses of disease progression and outcomes are observed clinically. Objectives: The aim of this study was to first use unsupervised machine learning to identify unique patient phenoclusters in AR, and subsequently evaluate their prognostic relevance. Methods: Clinical and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) characterization of moderate or severe AR patients was performed across 4 U.S. centers. Data from 2 centers were used for derivation of phenoclusters and validation was performed in the other 2. The outcome was all-cause death. An unsupervised clustering pipeline, Partition Around Medoids, used 23 clinical and CMR variables to derive patient clusters independent of outcomes. Results: Included were 972 patients with mean age 62 ± 23.2 years, 754 (78%) male, 680 (70%) trileaflet valve, and 330 (34%) underwent valve surgery. Over a median follow-up of 2.58 years (Q1-Q3: 1.03-5.50 years), the overall mortality rate was 12%. Four clusters were derived: 1) a younger predominantly male phenotype with majority of bicuspid aortic valve and high extent of left ventricular (LV) remodeling (1% mortality); 2) older male patients with predominantly tricuspid valves and intermediate outcomes (10% mortality); 3) older predominantly male patients with the highest burden of comorbidities, LV scarring, and dysfunction (22% mortality); and 4) a phenotype of predominantly female patients with high mortality and relatively higher symptoms burden, relatively lower extent of LV remodeling, and rate of aortic valve replacement (20% mortality). The clustering algorithm was independently associated with survival after adjustment for time-dependent aortic valve replacement and traditional risk markers of prognosis in patients with AR (C statistic 0.77 vs 0.75; P = 0.009 in the validation cohort). Conclusions: Unique patient phenoclusters of AR are described using a machine learning approach leveraging comprehensive CMR and clinical characterization. This approach may be an opportunity for a precision medicine approach to enhance risk stratification of patients with AR. Female patients with AR pose a unique phenotype with high mortality, which deserves greater attention.
KW - aortic regurgitation
KW - cardiac magnetic resonance
KW - cluster analysis
KW - machine learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001160286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105001160286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.01.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.01.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105001160286
SN - 1936-878X
VL - 18
SP - 557
EP - 568
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
IS - 5
ER -