TY - JOUR
T1 - Lung cancer screening using low-dose CT
T2 - The current national landscape
AU - Eberth, Jan M.
AU - Qiu, Rebecca
AU - Adams, Swann A.
AU - Salloum, Ramzi G.
AU - Bell, Nathanial
AU - Arrington, Amanda K.
AU - Linder, Suzanne K.
AU - Munden, Reginald F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Copyright:
Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Objectives: Although the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) lauds the efficacy of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) at reducing lung cancer mortality, it has not been widely used for population-based screening. By examining the availability of U.S. LDCT screening centers, and underlying rates of lung cancer incidence, mortality, and smoking prevalence, the need for additional centers may be determined. Materials and methods: Locations of 203 LDCT screening centers from the Lung Cancer Alliance Screening Centers of Excellence database, a list of active NLST and International Early Lung and Cardiac Action Program (I-ELCAP) screening centers, and an independently conducted survey of Society of Thoracic Radiology members were geocoded and mapped. County-level rates of lung cancer incidence, mortality, and smoking prevalence were also mapped and overlaid with the locations of the 203 LDCT screening centers. Results and conclusions: Results showed the majority of LDCT screening centers were located in the counties with the highest quartiles of lung cancer incidence and mortality in the Northeast and East North Central states, but several high-risk states had no or few identified screening centers including Oklahoma, Nevada, Mississippi, and Arkansas. As guidelines are implemented and reimbursement for LDCT screening follows, equitable access to LDCT screening centers will become increasingly important, particularly in regions with high rates of lung cancer incidence and smoking prevalence.
AB - Objectives: Although the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) lauds the efficacy of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) at reducing lung cancer mortality, it has not been widely used for population-based screening. By examining the availability of U.S. LDCT screening centers, and underlying rates of lung cancer incidence, mortality, and smoking prevalence, the need for additional centers may be determined. Materials and methods: Locations of 203 LDCT screening centers from the Lung Cancer Alliance Screening Centers of Excellence database, a list of active NLST and International Early Lung and Cardiac Action Program (I-ELCAP) screening centers, and an independently conducted survey of Society of Thoracic Radiology members were geocoded and mapped. County-level rates of lung cancer incidence, mortality, and smoking prevalence were also mapped and overlaid with the locations of the 203 LDCT screening centers. Results and conclusions: Results showed the majority of LDCT screening centers were located in the counties with the highest quartiles of lung cancer incidence and mortality in the Northeast and East North Central states, but several high-risk states had no or few identified screening centers including Oklahoma, Nevada, Mississippi, and Arkansas. As guidelines are implemented and reimbursement for LDCT screening follows, equitable access to LDCT screening centers will become increasingly important, particularly in regions with high rates of lung cancer incidence and smoking prevalence.
KW - Early detection of cancer
KW - Geographic information systems
KW - Geographic mapping
KW - Health services accessibility
KW - Lung neoplasms
KW - Smoking
KW - Spiral computed tomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926421259&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926421259&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.07.002
DO - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.07.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 25088660
AN - SCOPUS:84926421259
VL - 85
SP - 379
EP - 384
JO - Lung Cancer
JF - Lung Cancer
SN - 0169-5002
IS - 3
ER -