TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term outcomes in patients with mucinous, medullary, tubular, and invasive ductal carcinomas after lumpectomy
AU - Vo, Thao
AU - Xing, Yan
AU - Meric-Bernstam, Funda
AU - Mirza, Nadeem
AU - Vlastos, Georges
AU - Symmans, W. Fraser
AU - Perkins, George H.
AU - Buchholz, Thomas A.
AU - Babiera, Gildy V.
AU - Kuerer, Henry M.
AU - Bedrosian, Isabelle
AU - Akins, Jeri S.
AU - Hunt, Kelly K.
PY - 2007/10
Y1 - 2007/10
N2 - Background: Mucinous, medullary, and tubular carcinomas are uncommon types of breast cancer whose rarity does not permit large single-institution studies or randomized trials to define optimal treatments. In this study, we evaluated the long-term outcomes of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for these subtypes of breast cancer and compared them with those for invasive ductal carcinoma. Methods: In our institutional database of patients who received BCT from 1965 to 1999, 1,643 patients with stage I to II mucinous (61), medullary (37), tubular (60), and invasive ductal (1,485) histologies were identified. The clinical and pathologic features of the 4 groups were evaluated and compared with respect to local-regional recurrence rates, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Results: No statistically significant differences were found in the local-regional failure rate among the 4 groups (10.6-year median follow-up). Only patients with tubular carcinoma had better 5- and 10-year OS rates (P = .013). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with improved OS included age at or below 50 years, negative nodal status, use of chemotherapy or hormonal therapy, and tubular histology. Conclusions: BCT for mucinous, medullary, or tubular carcinoma resulted in similar local-regional failure rates to that for invasive ductal carcinoma. Tubular carcinoma patients had the most favorable OS. BCT is an appropriate treatment strategy for early-stage mucinous, medullary, and tubular carcinomas.
AB - Background: Mucinous, medullary, and tubular carcinomas are uncommon types of breast cancer whose rarity does not permit large single-institution studies or randomized trials to define optimal treatments. In this study, we evaluated the long-term outcomes of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for these subtypes of breast cancer and compared them with those for invasive ductal carcinoma. Methods: In our institutional database of patients who received BCT from 1965 to 1999, 1,643 patients with stage I to II mucinous (61), medullary (37), tubular (60), and invasive ductal (1,485) histologies were identified. The clinical and pathologic features of the 4 groups were evaluated and compared with respect to local-regional recurrence rates, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Results: No statistically significant differences were found in the local-regional failure rate among the 4 groups (10.6-year median follow-up). Only patients with tubular carcinoma had better 5- and 10-year OS rates (P = .013). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with improved OS included age at or below 50 years, negative nodal status, use of chemotherapy or hormonal therapy, and tubular histology. Conclusions: BCT for mucinous, medullary, or tubular carcinoma resulted in similar local-regional failure rates to that for invasive ductal carcinoma. Tubular carcinoma patients had the most favorable OS. BCT is an appropriate treatment strategy for early-stage mucinous, medullary, and tubular carcinomas.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Breast-conservation therapy
KW - Invasive ductal carcinoma
KW - Lumpectomy
KW - Medullary carcinoma
KW - Mucinous carcinoma
KW - Tubular carcinoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548387846&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548387846&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.06.012
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.06.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 17826073
AN - SCOPUS:34548387846
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 194
SP - 527
EP - 531
JO - American Journal of Surgery
JF - American Journal of Surgery
IS - 4
ER -