TY - JOUR
T1 - Lobectomy Provides the Best Survival for Stage I Lung Cancer Patients Despite Advanced Age
AU - Chan, Edward Y.
AU - Amirkhosravi, Farshad
AU - Nguyen, Duc T.
AU - Chihara, Ray K.
AU - Graviss, Edward A.
AU - Kim, Min P.
N1 - Funding Information:
The National Cancer Database (NCDB) is a joint project of the Commission of Cancer (CoC) of the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society. The CoC NCDB and the hospitals participating in the CoC NCDB are the sources of the deidentified data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis of the conclusions derived by the authors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Background: The Lung Cancer Study Group has shown that lobectomy provides the best survival in patients with non–small cell lung cancer. However, as patients become older, lobectomy may not provide a survival advantage compared with sublobar resection. Methods: We analyzed the National Cancer Database for octogenarians with pathologic stage I lung cancer from 2004 to 2016. We then evaluated the patients who underwent lobectomy or sublobar (segmentectomy or wedge) resection for the treatment of cancer. We analyzed the 5-year survival rates of the groups as well as a cubic spline plot to determine age cutoffs where lobectomy does not provide improved survival. Results: Among the octogenarians (227 134), there were 25 362 (26%) who had pathologic stage I lung cancer. There were 6370 (30%) patients who had sublobar resections (segmentectomy [n = 1192] and wedge resection [n = 5178]), whereas 14 594 (70%) patients had a lobectomy. There was significantly improved survival at 5 years with lobectomy compared with sublobar resection (48.5% vs 41.1%; P < .001). The cubic spline plot provided evidence that there was no age at which sublobar resection provided survival better than or equal to lobectomy (P < .001). Conclusions: In octogenarians with pathologic stage I lung cancer, lobectomy provided better 5-year survival compared with sublobar resection regardless of the age at surgical procedure. Hence, all patients with stage I cancer should be considered for a lobectomy if they are medically able to tolerate such a procedure.
AB - Background: The Lung Cancer Study Group has shown that lobectomy provides the best survival in patients with non–small cell lung cancer. However, as patients become older, lobectomy may not provide a survival advantage compared with sublobar resection. Methods: We analyzed the National Cancer Database for octogenarians with pathologic stage I lung cancer from 2004 to 2016. We then evaluated the patients who underwent lobectomy or sublobar (segmentectomy or wedge) resection for the treatment of cancer. We analyzed the 5-year survival rates of the groups as well as a cubic spline plot to determine age cutoffs where lobectomy does not provide improved survival. Results: Among the octogenarians (227 134), there were 25 362 (26%) who had pathologic stage I lung cancer. There were 6370 (30%) patients who had sublobar resections (segmentectomy [n = 1192] and wedge resection [n = 5178]), whereas 14 594 (70%) patients had a lobectomy. There was significantly improved survival at 5 years with lobectomy compared with sublobar resection (48.5% vs 41.1%; P < .001). The cubic spline plot provided evidence that there was no age at which sublobar resection provided survival better than or equal to lobectomy (P < .001). Conclusions: In octogenarians with pathologic stage I lung cancer, lobectomy provided better 5-year survival compared with sublobar resection regardless of the age at surgical procedure. Hence, all patients with stage I cancer should be considered for a lobectomy if they are medically able to tolerate such a procedure.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128129132&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85128129132&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.03.031
DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.03.031
M3 - Article
C2 - 35351425
AN - SCOPUS:85128129132
VL - 114
SP - 1824
EP - 1832
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
SN - 0003-4975
IS - 5
ER -