TY - JOUR
T1 - Limb Occlusion Pressure Versus Standard Pneumatic Tourniquet Pressure in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery
T2 - A Randomized Controlled Trial
AU - Aflatooni, Justin
AU - Goble, Haley
AU - Lambert, Bradley
AU - Liberman, Shari
AU - McCulloch, Patrick C.
N1 - Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
PY - 2025/5/1
Y1 - 2025/5/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Tourniquets are frequently used to minimize blood loss. Standard pressures (STPs) are typically higher than minimum limb occlusion pressure (LOP), which can contribute to postoperative pain among other complications. We sought to investigate the effect of STP versus LOP on postoperative pain and opioid medication use after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).METHODS: Sixty patients (age = 37 ± 15 years) undergoing ACLR were recruited and randomized into STP (275 mm Hg; M = 15/F = 15) or LOP (180 ± 29 mm Hg; M = 15/F = 15) group. A photoplethysmography probe was used to determine appropriate tourniquet pressures for the LOP group. Tourniquet and surgical site pain (Visual Analog Scale scores 0 to 10), as well as opioid medication usage, was recorded for 14 days after surgery. A generalized linear mixed model was used to detect differences in pain and medication use over the 14 days. The type-I error was defined as = 0.05.RESULTS: Tourniquet site pain was less in the LOP group during postoperative days (PODs) 1 to 5 (P < 0.05) and averaged across the two-week postoperative period (P = 0.015). Surgery site pain was less in the LOP group at PODs 9 and 14 (P < 0.05). Reduced opioid medication use was observed in the LOP group at PODs 3, 4, and 7 and averaged across the postoperative window (P < 0.05).CONCLUSION: Individualized LOPs yield decreased postoperative pain and narcotic use compared with STP during ACLR.
AB - BACKGROUND: Tourniquets are frequently used to minimize blood loss. Standard pressures (STPs) are typically higher than minimum limb occlusion pressure (LOP), which can contribute to postoperative pain among other complications. We sought to investigate the effect of STP versus LOP on postoperative pain and opioid medication use after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).METHODS: Sixty patients (age = 37 ± 15 years) undergoing ACLR were recruited and randomized into STP (275 mm Hg; M = 15/F = 15) or LOP (180 ± 29 mm Hg; M = 15/F = 15) group. A photoplethysmography probe was used to determine appropriate tourniquet pressures for the LOP group. Tourniquet and surgical site pain (Visual Analog Scale scores 0 to 10), as well as opioid medication usage, was recorded for 14 days after surgery. A generalized linear mixed model was used to detect differences in pain and medication use over the 14 days. The type-I error was defined as = 0.05.RESULTS: Tourniquet site pain was less in the LOP group during postoperative days (PODs) 1 to 5 (P < 0.05) and averaged across the two-week postoperative period (P = 0.015). Surgery site pain was less in the LOP group at PODs 9 and 14 (P < 0.05). Reduced opioid medication use was observed in the LOP group at PODs 3, 4, and 7 and averaged across the postoperative window (P < 0.05).CONCLUSION: Individualized LOPs yield decreased postoperative pain and narcotic use compared with STP during ACLR.
KW - Humans
KW - Tourniquets/adverse effects
KW - Female
KW - Male
KW - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods
KW - Adult
KW - Pain, Postoperative/etiology
KW - Pressure
KW - Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Pain Measurement
KW - Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105004935906
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105004935906&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00282
DO - 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00282
M3 - Article
C2 - 40326965
AN - SCOPUS:105004935906
SN - 2474-7661
VL - 9
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews
IS - 5
M1 - e24.00282
ER -