Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Larger-Volume Silicone Breast Implants Are Safe in Breast Reconstruction: The Athena Multicenter Prospective Study of 400 Patients

Patrick B. Garvey, Alan N. Larsen, Roman J. Skoracki, Risal S. Djohan, Mark R. Migliori, Marissa M. Tenenbaum, Jeffrey D. Friedman, Joseph M. Serletti, Alanna M. Rebecca, William J. Kane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For women in the United States desiring implant-based breast reconstruction, the maximum volume of commercially available silicone breast implants has, to date, been 800 cc. The authors evaluated the safety of Mentor larger-size MemoryGel Ultra-High Profile breast implants (≥930 cc) in women undergoing postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

METHODS: This 10-year, multicenter, open-label, prospective, investigational study assessed the safety and effectiveness of larger-volume implants in women undergoing postmastectomy 2-stage primary or revision reconstruction. Three-year Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression analyzed the association between patient and treatment characteristics and surgical outcomes. The BREAST-Q was used to assess effectiveness at 3 years.

RESULTS: A total of 400 women were enrolled (225 primary and 175 revision reconstruction). Mean body mass index was 35.8 kg/m 2 ; 81% had a body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m 2 . At 3 years, the cumulative incidence of postoperative complications (excluding rupture) was 63.0% (95% confidence interval, 58.1% to 67.9%). The reoperation rate was 24.5% (95% CI, 20.4% to 29.1%), and the explantation rate was 15.8% (95% CI, 23.5% to 19.9%). Independent predictors of complications included radiation therapy and a history of smoking. There were no significant associations between postoperative complications and implant volume greater than or equal to 1135 cc or less than 1135 cc. BREAST-Q scores at year 3 showed significant improvements from baseline in Satisfaction with Breasts, Psychosocial Well-Being, Sexual Well-Being, and Physical Well-Being (all P < 0.0001). The mean score for Satisfaction with Outcome was 79.9.

CONCLUSIONS: These 3-year results demonstrate that larger-volume silicone breast implants represent a safe and effective option for patients with larger breasts who are requesting postmastectomy implant-based reconstruction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)10-23
Number of pages14
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume158
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2026

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Female
  • Breast Implants/adverse effects
  • Prospective Studies
  • Middle Aged
  • Silicone Gels
  • Adult
  • Mastectomy
  • Reoperation/statistics & numerical data
  • Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
  • Breast Implantation/methods
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Mammaplasty/methods
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Breast Neoplasms/surgery
  • Aged

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Divisions

  • Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Larger-Volume Silicone Breast Implants Are Safe in Breast Reconstruction: The Athena Multicenter Prospective Study of 400 Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this