TY - JOUR
T1 - Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
T2 - The University of Maryland 3-year experience
AU - Jacobs, Stephen C.
AU - Cho, Eugene
AU - Dunkin, Brian J.
AU - Flowers, John L.
AU - Schweitzer, Eugene
AU - Cangro, Charles
AU - Fink, Jeffrey
AU - Farney, Alan
AU - Philosophe, Benjamin
AU - Jarrell, Bruce
AU - Bartlett, Stephen T.
AU - Barry, John M.
PY - 2000/1/1
Y1 - 2000/1/1
N2 - Purpose: We determined whether laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy decreases the morbidity of renal donation for the donor, while providing a renal allograft of a quality comparable to that of open donor nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: In a 3-year period laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed via the transperitoneal approach. We evaluated donor and recipient medical records for preoperative donor characteristics, intraoperative parameters and complications, and postoperative recovery and complications. Results: Of the 320 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies performed the left kidney was removed in 97.5%. Intraoperative complications, which developed in 10.4% of cases, tended to occur early in the experience and required conversion to open nephrectomy in 5. Average operative time was 3 1/2 hours and warm ischemia time was 2 1/2 minutes. As the series progressed, blood loss as well as laparoscopic port size and number decreased but extraction site size remained constant at 7 cm. Urinary retention, prolonged ileus, thigh numbness and incisional hernia were the most common postoperative complications. Postoperative analgesic requirements were low and average hospitalization was 66 hours. Conclusions: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy appears to be safe and decreases morbidity in the renal donor. Allograft function is comparable to that in open nephrectomy series. The availability of laparoscopic harvesting may be increasing the living donor volunteer pool.
AB - Purpose: We determined whether laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy decreases the morbidity of renal donation for the donor, while providing a renal allograft of a quality comparable to that of open donor nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: In a 3-year period laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed via the transperitoneal approach. We evaluated donor and recipient medical records for preoperative donor characteristics, intraoperative parameters and complications, and postoperative recovery and complications. Results: Of the 320 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies performed the left kidney was removed in 97.5%. Intraoperative complications, which developed in 10.4% of cases, tended to occur early in the experience and required conversion to open nephrectomy in 5. Average operative time was 3 1/2 hours and warm ischemia time was 2 1/2 minutes. As the series progressed, blood loss as well as laparoscopic port size and number decreased but extraction site size remained constant at 7 cm. Urinary retention, prolonged ileus, thigh numbness and incisional hernia were the most common postoperative complications. Postoperative analgesic requirements were low and average hospitalization was 66 hours. Conclusions: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy appears to be safe and decreases morbidity in the renal donor. Allograft function is comparable to that in open nephrectomy series. The availability of laparoscopic harvesting may be increasing the living donor volunteer pool.
KW - Kidney
KW - Kidney transplantation
KW - Laparoscopy
KW - Living donor
KW - Nephrectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033793569&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033793569&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67014-0
DO - 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67014-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 11025690
AN - SCOPUS:0033793569
VL - 164
SP - 1494
EP - 1499
JO - Journal of Urology
JF - Journal of Urology
SN - 0022-5347
IS - 5
ER -