Abstract
The classic surgical treatment for symptomatic giant aneurysms originating from the cavernous segment of the carotid artery has been either microsurgical direct clip-reconstruction or carotid occlusion followed by additional cerebral bypass for those patients who fail in a balloon test occlusion. Nevertheless the emergence of new endovascular techniques, especially flow-diverting devices, has promised to revolutionize the treatment of giant cavernous aneurysms, possibly avoiding major microsurgical operations. In this review the authors summarize the current "state-of-art" of treatment of giant cavernous aneurysms, comparing the overall outcomes, complications, morbidity and mortality rates of new flow-diverting devices in relation to traditional microsurgical series.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 505-512 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Neurosurgical Review |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2013 |
Keywords
- Cavernous sinus aneurysms
- Clinical trials
- Flow-diverting devices
- Giant intracranial aneurysms
- Pipeline device
- Silk stent
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Neurology
- Surgery
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is flow diversion the death of cerebral bypass and coiling/stent-assisted coiling for giant cavernous aneurysms? A critical review on comparative outcomes and ongoing clinical trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS