TY - JOUR
T1 - Invariant Tensor-to-Matrix Mappings for Evaluation of Tensorial Expressions
AU - Nadeau, J. C.
AU - Ferrari, M.
N1 - Funding Information:
JCN was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) grant MSS–9215671 and MF gratefully acknowledges the support of the NSF through the National Young Investigator Award in the Mechanics and Materials program.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - A class of mappings is presented, parameterized by a variable η, that operates on tensorial expressions to yield equivalent matrical expressions which are then easily evaluated, either numerically or symbolically, using standard matrix operations. The tensorial expressions considered involve scalar, second- and fourth-order tensors, double contractions, inversion and transposition. Also addressed is coordinate transformation and eigenanalysis of fourth-order tensors. The class of mappings considered is invariant, meaning that for a given η the corresponding mapping depends only on the order of the tensor upon which it acts and not, for example, on its physical interpretation (e.g., stress vs. strain, or stiffness vs. compliance). As a result the proposed mappings avoid ad hoc definitions like that of engineering shear strain (i.e., γij := 2εij for i ≠ j) which is inconsistent with an invariant mapping. Two convenient choices for the parameter η are presented. Appendix B presents a convenient summary for instructional purposes.
AB - A class of mappings is presented, parameterized by a variable η, that operates on tensorial expressions to yield equivalent matrical expressions which are then easily evaluated, either numerically or symbolically, using standard matrix operations. The tensorial expressions considered involve scalar, second- and fourth-order tensors, double contractions, inversion and transposition. Also addressed is coordinate transformation and eigenanalysis of fourth-order tensors. The class of mappings considered is invariant, meaning that for a given η the corresponding mapping depends only on the order of the tensor upon which it acts and not, for example, on its physical interpretation (e.g., stress vs. strain, or stiffness vs. compliance). As a result the proposed mappings avoid ad hoc definitions like that of engineering shear strain (i.e., γij := 2εij for i ≠ j) which is inconsistent with an invariant mapping. Two convenient choices for the parameter η are presented. Appendix B presents a convenient summary for instructional purposes.
KW - Condensed/ engineering/ matrix notation
KW - Tensor-to-matrix mappings
KW - Tensorial expression evaluation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032277459&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032277459&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1023/A:1007539929374
DO - 10.1023/A:1007539929374
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0032277459
SN - 0374-3535
VL - 52
SP - 43
EP - 61
JO - Journal of Elasticity
JF - Journal of Elasticity
IS - 1
ER -