Introduction: How did it go so wrong?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Nazi doctors, nurses, scientists, and public health officials voluntarily and enthusiastically conducted inhumane and unethical human subjects research. They were empowered by eugenics, which was an acclaimed worldwide movement long before Hitler co-opted it for his own purposes. German eugenicists emulated American policies such as the world’s first involuntary sterilization laws, defended their anti-miscegenation policies by citing US treatment of its black citizens, and received philanthropic and moral support from American eugenicists. At the Nuremberg Doctors’ Trial, which produced the landmark Nuremberg Code, defendants cited unethical American experiments. Germany was the most medically advanced nation at the time, and many nations sent their research trainees to study in Germany. American medical schools emulated Germany’s system of medical education. Nonetheless, much of the world has accepted myths that the German researchers were mad, incompetent, isolated, or sadistic ideologues who could not ethically justify their actions. Since acceptance of these myths has greatly diminished serious consideration of the implications of Nazi experiments on human subjects research after the Holocaust, an effort is made to dispel them. This chapter also provides the historical background for the essays by our distinguished authors and challenges the reader to study and reflect upon how medical ethics failed during the Third Reich.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHuman Subjects Research After the Holocaust
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages1-20
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9783319057026
ISBN (Print)9783319057019
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Altmetrics

Cite this

Standard

Introduction : How did it go so wrong? / Rubenfeld, Sheldon.

Human Subjects Research After the Holocaust. Springer International Publishing, 2014. p. 1-20.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Harvard

Rubenfeld, S 2014, Introduction: How did it go so wrong? in Human Subjects Research After the Holocaust. Springer International Publishing, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05702-6_1

APA

Rubenfeld, S. (2014). Introduction: How did it go so wrong? In Human Subjects Research After the Holocaust (pp. 1-20). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05702-6_1

Vancouver

Rubenfeld S. Introduction: How did it go so wrong? In Human Subjects Research After the Holocaust. Springer International Publishing. 2014. p. 1-20 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05702-6_1

Author

Rubenfeld, Sheldon. / Introduction : How did it go so wrong?. Human Subjects Research After the Holocaust. Springer International Publishing, 2014. pp. 1-20

BibTeX

@inbook{4f6b820879b1424e95eebaa122bb039a,
title = "Introduction: How did it go so wrong?",
abstract = "Nazi doctors, nurses, scientists, and public health officials voluntarily and enthusiastically conducted inhumane and unethical human subjects research. They were empowered by eugenics, which was an acclaimed worldwide movement long before Hitler co-opted it for his own purposes. German eugenicists emulated American policies such as the world’s first involuntary sterilization laws, defended their anti-miscegenation policies by citing US treatment of its black citizens, and received philanthropic and moral support from American eugenicists. At the Nuremberg Doctors’ Trial, which produced the landmark Nuremberg Code, defendants cited unethical American experiments. Germany was the most medically advanced nation at the time, and many nations sent their research trainees to study in Germany. American medical schools emulated Germany’s system of medical education. Nonetheless, much of the world has accepted myths that the German researchers were mad, incompetent, isolated, or sadistic ideologues who could not ethically justify their actions. Since acceptance of these myths has greatly diminished serious consideration of the implications of Nazi experiments on human subjects research after the Holocaust, an effort is made to dispel them. This chapter also provides the historical background for the essays by our distinguished authors and challenges the reader to study and reflect upon how medical ethics failed during the Third Reich.",
author = "Sheldon Rubenfeld",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-05702-6_1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783319057019",
pages = "1--20",
booktitle = "Human Subjects Research After the Holocaust",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Introduction

T2 - How did it go so wrong?

AU - Rubenfeld, Sheldon

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Nazi doctors, nurses, scientists, and public health officials voluntarily and enthusiastically conducted inhumane and unethical human subjects research. They were empowered by eugenics, which was an acclaimed worldwide movement long before Hitler co-opted it for his own purposes. German eugenicists emulated American policies such as the world’s first involuntary sterilization laws, defended their anti-miscegenation policies by citing US treatment of its black citizens, and received philanthropic and moral support from American eugenicists. At the Nuremberg Doctors’ Trial, which produced the landmark Nuremberg Code, defendants cited unethical American experiments. Germany was the most medically advanced nation at the time, and many nations sent their research trainees to study in Germany. American medical schools emulated Germany’s system of medical education. Nonetheless, much of the world has accepted myths that the German researchers were mad, incompetent, isolated, or sadistic ideologues who could not ethically justify their actions. Since acceptance of these myths has greatly diminished serious consideration of the implications of Nazi experiments on human subjects research after the Holocaust, an effort is made to dispel them. This chapter also provides the historical background for the essays by our distinguished authors and challenges the reader to study and reflect upon how medical ethics failed during the Third Reich.

AB - Nazi doctors, nurses, scientists, and public health officials voluntarily and enthusiastically conducted inhumane and unethical human subjects research. They were empowered by eugenics, which was an acclaimed worldwide movement long before Hitler co-opted it for his own purposes. German eugenicists emulated American policies such as the world’s first involuntary sterilization laws, defended their anti-miscegenation policies by citing US treatment of its black citizens, and received philanthropic and moral support from American eugenicists. At the Nuremberg Doctors’ Trial, which produced the landmark Nuremberg Code, defendants cited unethical American experiments. Germany was the most medically advanced nation at the time, and many nations sent their research trainees to study in Germany. American medical schools emulated Germany’s system of medical education. Nonetheless, much of the world has accepted myths that the German researchers were mad, incompetent, isolated, or sadistic ideologues who could not ethically justify their actions. Since acceptance of these myths has greatly diminished serious consideration of the implications of Nazi experiments on human subjects research after the Holocaust, an effort is made to dispel them. This chapter also provides the historical background for the essays by our distinguished authors and challenges the reader to study and reflect upon how medical ethics failed during the Third Reich.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957019923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957019923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-05702-6_1

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-05702-6_1

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319057019

SP - 1

EP - 20

BT - Human Subjects Research After the Holocaust

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -

ID: 38749504