TY - JOUR
T1 - Interobserver Variability in Applying American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging 2016 Guidelines for Estimation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressure
AU - for Diastolic Function Assessment Collaborators
AU - Nagueh, Sherif
AU - Abraham, Theodore P.
AU - Aurigemma, Gerard P.
AU - Bax, Jeroen J.
AU - Beladan, Carmen
AU - Browning, Alyssa
AU - Chamsi-Pasha, Mohammed A.
AU - Delgado, Victoria
AU - Derumeaux, Genevieve
AU - Dolci, Giulia
AU - Donal, Erwan
AU - Edvardsen, Thor
AU - El Tallawi, Kinan Carlos
AU - Ernande, Laura
AU - Esposito, Roberta
AU - Flachskampf, Frank A.
AU - Galderisi, Maurizio
AU - Gentry, James
AU - Goldstein, Steven A.
AU - Harb, Serge C.
AU - Hubert, Arnaud
AU - Hung, Judy
AU - Klein, Allan L.
AU - Lancellotti, Patrizio
AU - Mahmood, Redah Z.
AU - Marino, Paolo
AU - Popescu, Bogdan A.
AU - Previato, Martina
AU - Sanghai, Saket R.
AU - Smiseth, Otto A.
AU - Xu, Susan
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Assessment of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure is among the important components of a comprehensive echocardiographic report. Previous studies noted wide limits of agreement using 2009 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Echocardiography guidelines, but reproducibility of 2016 guidelines update in estimating LV filling pressure is unknown. METHODS: Echocardiographic and hemodynamic data were obtained from 50 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for clinical indications. Clinical and echocardiographic findings but not invasive hemodynamics were provided to 4 groups of observers, including experienced echocardiographers and cardiology fellows. Invasively acquired LV filling pressure was the gold standard. RESULTS: In group I of 8 experienced echocardiographers from the guidelines writing committee, sensitivity for elevated LV filling pressure was 92% for all observers, and specificity was 93±6%. Fleiss κ-value for the agreement in group I was 0.80. In group II of 4 fellows in training, sensitivity was 91±2%, and specificity was 95±2%. Fleiss κ-value for the agreement in group II was 0.94. In group III of 9 experienced echocardiographers who had not participated in drafting the guidelines, sensitivity was 88±5%, and specificity was 91±7%. Fleiss κ-value for the agreement in group III was 0.76. In group IV of 7 other fellows, sensitivity was 91±3%, and specificity was 92±5%. Fleiss κ-value for the agreement in group IV was 0.89. CONCLUSIONS: There is a good level of agreement and accuracy in the estimation of LV filling pressure using the American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging 2016 recommendations update, irrespective of the experience level of the observer.
AB - BACKGROUND: Assessment of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure is among the important components of a comprehensive echocardiographic report. Previous studies noted wide limits of agreement using 2009 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Echocardiography guidelines, but reproducibility of 2016 guidelines update in estimating LV filling pressure is unknown. METHODS: Echocardiographic and hemodynamic data were obtained from 50 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for clinical indications. Clinical and echocardiographic findings but not invasive hemodynamics were provided to 4 groups of observers, including experienced echocardiographers and cardiology fellows. Invasively acquired LV filling pressure was the gold standard. RESULTS: In group I of 8 experienced echocardiographers from the guidelines writing committee, sensitivity for elevated LV filling pressure was 92% for all observers, and specificity was 93±6%. Fleiss κ-value for the agreement in group I was 0.80. In group II of 4 fellows in training, sensitivity was 91±2%, and specificity was 95±2%. Fleiss κ-value for the agreement in group II was 0.94. In group III of 9 experienced echocardiographers who had not participated in drafting the guidelines, sensitivity was 88±5%, and specificity was 91±7%. Fleiss κ-value for the agreement in group III was 0.76. In group IV of 7 other fellows, sensitivity was 91±3%, and specificity was 92±5%. Fleiss κ-value for the agreement in group IV was 0.89. CONCLUSIONS: There is a good level of agreement and accuracy in the estimation of LV filling pressure using the American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging 2016 recommendations update, irrespective of the experience level of the observer.
KW - diastole
KW - echocardiography
KW - echocardiography, Doppler
KW - guideline
KW - humans
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059828151&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059828151&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.008122
DO - 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.008122
M3 - Article
C2 - 30632389
SN - 1941-9651
VL - 12
SP - e008122
JO - Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging
JF - Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging
IS - 1
ER -