Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Interobserver Reproducibility of Pelvicalyceal Invasion in Renal Cell Carcinoma Nephrectomies Among Genitourinary Pathologists

Ankur R. Sangoi, Mahmut Akgul, Aysha Mubeen, Robert Humble, Douglas Jian Xian Wu, Richard Pacheco, Andres Acosta, Mahul Amin, Manju Aron, Fadi Brimo, Emily Chan, Liang Cheng, John Cheville, Katrina Collins, Kristine Cornejo, Jasreman Dhillon, Michelle R. Downes, Jonathan I. Epstein, Michelle Hirsch, Payal KapurAnandi Lobo, Rohit Mehra, Sambit Mohanty, George Netto, Adeboye O. Osunkoya, Gladell Paner, Priya Rao, Rola Saleeb, Rajal B. Shah, Steven Shen, Steven Smith, Satish Tickoo, Maria Tretiakova, Kiril Trpkov, Sara Wobker, Pheroze Tamboli, Debra Zynger, Sean R. Williamson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Pelvicalyceal invasion (PCI) is a relatively novel pT3a staging parameter for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) nephrectomies. While interobserver reproducibility staging studies of sinus/vascular invasion in RCC exist, a similar evaluation for PCI has not been performed. Moreover, in our experience, there is also diagnostic variability in how pathologists interpret PCI. Herein, we explore interobserver reproducibility among genitourinary (GU) pathologists. Twenty hematoxylin and eosin-stained digitized slides from RCCs (all grossly approaching the renal pelvis) were distributed to 31 GU pathologists to classify each as PCI or not PCI based on their respective clinical practices; slides with concomitant sinus/fat/vascular invasion were excluded. Slides were then evaluated for the following 4 morphologic features: tumor abutting renal pelvis, tumor pushing/indenting into the renal pelvis, polypoid configuration of tumor into the renal pelvis, and tumor eroding through renal pelvic urothelium. Interobserver reproducibility was assessed, and the morphologic features were correlated with PCI. Relationships between pathologists’ interpretations, morphologic features, and PCI were evaluated using hierarchical clustering. Although the diagnosis of PCI was relatively uniform with a majority agreement (>67%) reached in 16/20 slides, overall interobserver reproducibility was only moderate (kappa=0.601). While all 4 morphologic features were sensitive for PCI, polypoid configuration of the tumor into the renal pelvis and the tumor eroding through the renal pelvic urothelium were most specific (90%, 100%, respectively). Although we show general consensus among genitourinary pathologists on PCI assessment, clarifying the diagnostic guidelines with specific criteria should be included in pathologic staging systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1307-1314
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology
Volume49
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • invasion
  • kidney
  • pT3a
  • pelvicalyceal
  • renal cell carcinoma
  • staging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Surgery
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interobserver Reproducibility of Pelvicalyceal Invasion in Renal Cell Carcinoma Nephrectomies Among Genitourinary Pathologists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this