Abstract
Background: Infection is a dreaded complication of implant-based breast reconstruction. There is a paucity of literature on the outcomes of a secondary reconstruction after infected implant-based breast reconstruction explantation. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent a second implant-based breast reconstruction following a failed infected device between January of 2006 and December of 2019. Surgical and patient-reported outcomes (BREAST-Q) were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 6093 implant-based breast reconstructions were performed during the study period, 298 (5 percent) of which involved device removal because of infection. Eighty-three patients ultimately received 92 second-attempt breast implants. Thirty-six percent of cases developed at least one postoperative complication, with infection [23 breasts (25 percent)] being the most common. Compared with first-attempt implant-based breast reconstruction, we found significantly higher infection rates among second-attempt cases (9 percent and 21 percent, respectively; p = 0.0008). Patient-reported satisfaction with the breast and sexual well-being were lower after second-attempt than after first-attempt implant-based breast reconstruction (p = 0.018 and p = 0.002, respectively) reported in the literature. Mean follow-up was 41 ± 35 months. If we exclude patients with prior radiation therapy and those who received device exchange, the success rate is 88 percent. Conclusions: It is reasonable to offer women second-attempt implant-based breast reconstruction after explantation because of infection. However, this patient population has a higher infection and explantation rate and lower patient-reported satisfaction than patients undergoing first-attempt implant-based breast reconstruction. Because of these increased surgical risks and elevated complication rates, patients must be given reasonable expectations during preoperative discussions and when providing informed consent for second-attempt implant-based breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 247E-259E |
| Journal | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery |
| Volume | 150 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1 2022 |
Keywords
- Breast Implantation/adverse effects
- Breast Implants/adverse effects
- Breast Neoplasms/etiology
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Mammaplasty/adverse effects
- Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
- Retrospective Studies
- Treatment Outcome
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction following Infected Device Explantation: Is a Second Attempt Worth It?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS