TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of the Dexamethasone Implant on Slowing Diabetic Retinopathy Progression
T2 - Post Hoc Analysis of the MEAD Study
AU - Blinder, Kevin J.
AU - Wykoff, Charles C.
AU - Ferencz, Joseph R.
AU - Ehlers, Justis P.
AU - Fang, Yixin
AU - Lai, Hongxin
AU - Ogidigben, Miller
AU - López, Francisco J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Purpose:To evaluate the effects of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) treatment on Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) scores and disease progression in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).Methods:The 3-year, randomized, phase 3 MEAD study evaluated DEX 0.35 and 0.7 mg versus sham (treatment at ≥6-month intervals) in patients with DME. This post hoc analysis used data from the sham and pooled DEX arms.Results:The proportion of patients with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement was significantly higher after DEX treatment compared with sham at 24 months only (8.8% vs 4.2%, OR=2.1, P=0.016). Among those with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement, the time to first ≥2-step improvement was shorter with DEX (P<0.001; median 400 days with DEX versus 713 with sham). There were no significant differences between the DEX and sham groups in the proportion of patients who progressed from non-proliferative to proliferative DR, but among those who progressed, the time to progression was lengthened with DEX (P<0.001; median 531.1 days with DEX versus 191 with sham).Conclusion:This post hoc analysis of MEAD study data showed that DEX treatment may potentially have a positive impact on DR by reducing disease severity and slowing progression in DR patients with central DME.
AB - Purpose:To evaluate the effects of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) treatment on Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) scores and disease progression in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).Methods:The 3-year, randomized, phase 3 MEAD study evaluated DEX 0.35 and 0.7 mg versus sham (treatment at ≥6-month intervals) in patients with DME. This post hoc analysis used data from the sham and pooled DEX arms.Results:The proportion of patients with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement was significantly higher after DEX treatment compared with sham at 24 months only (8.8% vs 4.2%, OR=2.1, P=0.016). Among those with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement, the time to first ≥2-step improvement was shorter with DEX (P<0.001; median 400 days with DEX versus 713 with sham). There were no significant differences between the DEX and sham groups in the proportion of patients who progressed from non-proliferative to proliferative DR, but among those who progressed, the time to progression was lengthened with DEX (P<0.001; median 531.1 days with DEX versus 191 with sham).Conclusion:This post hoc analysis of MEAD study data showed that DEX treatment may potentially have a positive impact on DR by reducing disease severity and slowing progression in DR patients with central DME.
KW - dexamethasone
KW - diabetic macular edema
KW - diabetic retinopathy
KW - diabetic retinopathy improvement
KW - fundus photography
KW - intravitreal corticosteroid
KW - optical coherence tomography
KW - randomized clinical trial
KW - sustained-release implant
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105011693853
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105011693853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/IAE.0000000000004623
DO - 10.1097/IAE.0000000000004623
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105011693853
SN - 0275-004X
JO - Retina
JF - Retina
M1 - 4623
ER -