Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study

Debra A. Patt, Amila Meera Patel, Arun Bhardwaj, Kathryn Elizabeth Hudson, Amanda Christman, Ninad Amondikar, Susan Marie Escudier, Sydney Townsend, Holly Books, Ethan Basch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE There is raising interest to implement electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) for symptom monitoring to enhance the quality of cancer care. Step 1 of the Texas Two-Step Study demonstrated successful implementation of an ePRO system in >200 sites of service of a large community oncology practice. We now report step 2 of this study which evaluates the impact of ePROs on outcomes among patients enrolled in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Oncology Care Model (OCM) program. METHODS This observational study focused on patients with metastatic cancer enrolled in OCM at large community oncology practice located in Texas between July 2020 and December 2020. Patients who completed ≥1 survey via the ePRO tool were included in the study group and were propensity score matched with patients in a control group. Adverse events (AEs; hospitalizations, emergency department visits, deaths) and total cost of care were a priori study outcomes. Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests compared continuous and categorical variables, respectively, with multivariable logistic regression for adjustment of covariates. RESULTS Of 831 patients with metastatic cancer, 458 matched patients (229/group) were identified, with 52% male and a mean age of 74 years. Mean total AEs were lower in the study group compared with control (0.98 v 1.41; P =.007), with decreased hospitalizations (20% v 32.5%; P =.002), emergency visits (38.4% v 42.3%; P >.05), and deaths (11.8% v 16.6%; P >.05). Average number of hospitalizations was lower (0.28 v 0.52; P =.003) with reduced mean duration of hospitalizations (1.9 vs 3.2 d; P =.03). The total cost of care was reduced by an average of $1,146 per member per month. CONCLUSION Symptom monitoring with ePROs improved quality and value of cancer care delivery by reducing hospitalizations, emergency visits, and deaths while lowering cost of care in a large oncology practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere2300182
JournalJCO clinical cancer informatics
Volume7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 28 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this