TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of C-arm CT on Hepatic Arterial Interventions for Hepatic Malignancies
AU - Wallace, Michael J.
AU - Murthy, Ravi
AU - Kamat, Paresh P.
AU - Moore, Teri
AU - Rao, Sujaya H.
AU - Ensor, Jr., Joe Edward
AU - Gupta, Sanjay
AU - Ahrar, Kamran
AU - Madoff, David C.
AU - McRae, Stephen E.
AU - Hicks, Marshall E.
PY - 2007/12/1
Y1 - 2007/12/1
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate C-arm computed tomography (CT) and assess its potential impact on hepatic arterial interventions. Materials and Methods: Between May 2005 and March 2006, all hepatic arterial interventions for hepatic malignancies were retrospectively reviewed. C-arm CT acquisitions were performed as an adjunct to conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The number of procedures with C-arm CT, the acquisitions per intervention, and the procedure time for all interventions were recorded. The added information provided by C-arm CT was scored as category 1 (no additional information); category 2 (added information without impact on procedure management); or category 3 (added information with impact on procedure management). Intervention types included infusions, radioembolization, embolization, and chemoembolization. A two-sided, two-sample t test was used to compare interventions with and without C-arm CT, and P values less than .05 were considered significant. Results: C-arm CT was used in 86 of 240 interventions (36%) in 135 patients. The mean number of acquisitions per study was 1.9 (range, 1-4). Thirty-five interventions (40.7%) were scored as category 2 and 16 interventions (18.6%) were scored as category 3. Chemoembolization was associated with the highest percentage of C-arm CT investigations classified as category 2 and 3 assessed per intervention. The mean procedure time was significantly longer (18 minutes) when C-arm CT was used (P < .001). Conclusions: C-arm CT provides additional imaging information beyond DSA during hepatic arterial interventions (approximately 60%), and this information impacted procedure management in 19% of cases. C-arm CT offers the greatest opportunity for additional information during chemoembolization procedures and is responsible for a significant but acceptable increase in procedure time for this type of hepatic intervention.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate C-arm computed tomography (CT) and assess its potential impact on hepatic arterial interventions. Materials and Methods: Between May 2005 and March 2006, all hepatic arterial interventions for hepatic malignancies were retrospectively reviewed. C-arm CT acquisitions were performed as an adjunct to conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The number of procedures with C-arm CT, the acquisitions per intervention, and the procedure time for all interventions were recorded. The added information provided by C-arm CT was scored as category 1 (no additional information); category 2 (added information without impact on procedure management); or category 3 (added information with impact on procedure management). Intervention types included infusions, radioembolization, embolization, and chemoembolization. A two-sided, two-sample t test was used to compare interventions with and without C-arm CT, and P values less than .05 were considered significant. Results: C-arm CT was used in 86 of 240 interventions (36%) in 135 patients. The mean number of acquisitions per study was 1.9 (range, 1-4). Thirty-five interventions (40.7%) were scored as category 2 and 16 interventions (18.6%) were scored as category 3. Chemoembolization was associated with the highest percentage of C-arm CT investigations classified as category 2 and 3 assessed per intervention. The mean procedure time was significantly longer (18 minutes) when C-arm CT was used (P < .001). Conclusions: C-arm CT provides additional imaging information beyond DSA during hepatic arterial interventions (approximately 60%), and this information impacted procedure management in 19% of cases. C-arm CT offers the greatest opportunity for additional information during chemoembolization procedures and is responsible for a significant but acceptable increase in procedure time for this type of hepatic intervention.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36348997095&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36348997095&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.07.021
DO - 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.07.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 18057284
AN - SCOPUS:36348997095
SN - 1051-0443
VL - 18
SP - 1500
EP - 1507
JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
IS - 12
ER -