Imaging evaluation of acute chest pain: Systematic review of evidence base and cost-effectiveness

Fabian Bamberg; Roy P. Marcus; Christopher L. Schlett; U. Joseph Schoepf; Thorsten R. Johnson; John W. Nance; Udo Hoffmann; Maximilian F. Reiser; Konstantin Nikolaou

doi:10.1097/RTI.0b013e3182628053

Imaging evaluation of acute chest pain: Systematic review of evidence base and cost-effectiveness

Fabian Bamberg, Roy P. Marcus, Christopher L. Schlett, U. Joseph Schoepf, Thorsten R. Johnson, John W. Nance, Udo Hoffmann, Maximilian F. Reiser, Konstantin Nikolaou

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Given the often inconclusive initial evaluation of patients presenting with acute chest pain in the Emergency Department, advanced imaging techniques have been evaluated in the quest for improving the current standard of care. In this article, we systematically compare and evaluate the available evidence and cost-effectiveness of radionucleotide myocardial perfusion imaging, cardiac computed tomography angiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using data from PubMed and EMBASE through January 2012. The obtained data were summarized and categorized according to the reached level of evidence and its impact on the decision-making process.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	289-295
Number of pages	7
Journal	Journal of Thoracic Imaging
Volume	27
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0b013e3182628053
State	Published - Sep 2012

Keywords

acute chest pain
cardiac computed tomography
cost-effectiveness
evidencebased medicine
magnetic resonance imaging
myocardial perfusion imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Access to Document

10.1097/RTI.0b013e3182628053

Cite this

@article{ab367a5877224baaab189a6790d0ecd1,

title = "Imaging evaluation of acute chest pain: Systematic review of evidence base and cost-effectiveness",

abstract = "Given the often inconclusive initial evaluation of patients presenting with acute chest pain in the Emergency Department, advanced imaging techniques have been evaluated in the quest for improving the current standard of care. In this article, we systematically compare and evaluate the available evidence and cost-effectiveness of radionucleotide myocardial perfusion imaging, cardiac computed tomography angiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using data from PubMed and EMBASE through January 2012. The obtained data were summarized and categorized according to the reached level of evidence and its impact on the decision-making process.",

keywords = "acute chest pain, cardiac computed tomography, cost-effectiveness, evidencebased medicine, magnetic resonance imaging, myocardial perfusion imaging",

author = "Fabian Bamberg and Marcus, \{Roy P.\} and Schlett, \{Christopher L.\} and Schoepf, \{U. Joseph\} and Johnson, \{Thorsten R.\} and Nance, \{John W.\} and Udo Hoffmann and Reiser, \{Maximilian F.\} and Konstantin Nikolaou",

year = "2012",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1097/RTI.0b013e3182628053",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "27",

pages = "289--295",

journal = "Journal of Thoracic Imaging",

issn = "0883-5993",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging evaluation of acute chest pain

T2 - Systematic review of evidence base and cost-effectiveness

AU - Bamberg, Fabian

AU - Marcus, Roy P.

AU - Schlett, Christopher L.

AU - Schoepf, U. Joseph

AU - Johnson, Thorsten R.

AU - Nance, John W.

AU - Hoffmann, Udo

AU - Reiser, Maximilian F.

AU - Nikolaou, Konstantin

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Given the often inconclusive initial evaluation of patients presenting with acute chest pain in the Emergency Department, advanced imaging techniques have been evaluated in the quest for improving the current standard of care. In this article, we systematically compare and evaluate the available evidence and cost-effectiveness of radionucleotide myocardial perfusion imaging, cardiac computed tomography angiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using data from PubMed and EMBASE through January 2012. The obtained data were summarized and categorized according to the reached level of evidence and its impact on the decision-making process.

AB - Given the often inconclusive initial evaluation of patients presenting with acute chest pain in the Emergency Department, advanced imaging techniques have been evaluated in the quest for improving the current standard of care. In this article, we systematically compare and evaluate the available evidence and cost-effectiveness of radionucleotide myocardial perfusion imaging, cardiac computed tomography angiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using data from PubMed and EMBASE through January 2012. The obtained data were summarized and categorized according to the reached level of evidence and its impact on the decision-making process.

KW - acute chest pain

KW - cardiac computed tomography

KW - cost-effectiveness

KW - evidencebased medicine

KW - magnetic resonance imaging

KW - myocardial perfusion imaging

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84865724647

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865724647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/RTI.0b013e3182628053

DO - 10.1097/RTI.0b013e3182628053

M3 - Article

C2 - 22914122

AN - SCOPUS:84865724647

SN - 0883-5993

VL - 27

SP - 289

EP - 295

JO - Journal of Thoracic Imaging

JF - Journal of Thoracic Imaging

IS - 5

ER -

Imaging evaluation of acute chest pain: Systematic review of evidence base and cost-effectiveness

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this