Idiotype-induced T cell stimulation requires antigen presentation in association with HLA-DR molecules

Q. Yi, G. Holm, A. K. Lefvert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

An important and yet unresolved question concerns the mode of T cell recognition of idiotypic epitopes on immunoglobulin molecules in humans. Results from murine and human studies show that some idiotype-specific T cells recognize conformational epitopes on immunoglobulin, and such T cells are not MHC-restricted. In the present study T cell stimulation induced by idiotypic determinants on the autologous monoclonal IgG (M-components) from patients with monoclonal gammopathies was studied. In parallel, T cell stimulation in response to a conventional antigen, purified protein derivative, was also examined. It is shown that, as with conventional antigen, idiotype-induced T cell stimulation requires the presence of antigen-presenting cells (APC; monocytes and/or B cells), and is MHC class II (DR)-restricted. B cells, but not monocytes, can present idiotypic determinants to T cells at very low antigen concentrations, while monocytes do so only when antigen is present at high concentrations. Antigen processing and presentation is abrogated by treatment of APC with chloroquine. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that human idiotype-specific T cells recognize processed idiotypic determinants presented by MHC class II (HLA-DR) molecules on APC, and that B cells require about 1000-fold less antigen than monocytes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)359-365
Number of pages7
JournalClinical and Experimental Immunology
Volume104
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996

Keywords

  • Antigen presentation
  • Idiotype
  • M-component
  • MHC molecules
  • T cells

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Idiotype-induced T cell stimulation requires antigen presentation in association with HLA-DR molecules'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this