TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying high-risk asymptomatic carotid stenosis
AU - Bogiatzi, Chrysi
AU - Cocker, Myra S.
AU - Beanlands, Robert
AU - Spence, J. David
N1 - Funding Information:
JD Spence and R Beanlands hold grants from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Funding Information:
Chrysi Bogiatzi1 MD, Myra S Cocker2 PhD, Robert Beanlands3,5 MD FRCPC FACC & J David Spence†4,5 MD FRCPC FAHA †Author for correspondence 1Graduate Student in Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, Stroke Prevention & Atherosclerosis Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, London, Canada 2Cardiac Imaging Research Fellow, University of Ottawa Heart Institute supported by the Molecular Function and Imaging Program, Ottawa, Canada 3Career Investigator for Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Tier 1 Chair in Cardiovascular Research University of Ottawa, Saul and Edna Goldfarb Chair in Cardiac Imaging, Chief of Cardiac Imaging and Director of the National Cardiac PET Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada 4Professor, of Neurology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, Stroke Prevention & Atherosclerosis Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, 1400 Western Road, London, ON N6G 2V2, Canada Tel: +1 519 663 3113; Fax: +1 519 63 3018; E-mail: [email protected] 5Canadian Atherosclerosis Imaging Network (http://www.canadianimagingnetwork.org/)
Copyright:
Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/3
Y1 - 2012/3
N2 - Introduction: With more intensive medical therapy, the risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) is now below the risk of carotid endarterectomy or stenting (intervention); ∼ 90% of patients would be better with only medical therapy. It is important, therefore, to have methods to identify the ∼ 10% of patients who stand to benefit from intervention. Areas covered: We review the evidence that the risk of asymptomatic stenosis is now below the risk of intervention, and evidence for several approaches to identifying high-risk ACS: transcranial Doppler embolus detection, echolucency and neovascularity on ultrasound, ulceration on three-dimensional ultrasound, plaque composition on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), plaque inflammation on positron emission tomography and assessment of cerebral blood flow reserve. Expert opinion: Carotid endarterectomy or stenting should be performed only in patients with ACS if they have microemboli on transcranial Doppler, three or more ulcers detected on three-dimensional ultrasound or other features of unstable plaque such as plaque echolucency on ultrasound, intraplaque hemorrhage detected on MRI, inflamed plaques detected on PET/CT or reduced cerebral blood flow reserve. Most patients with ACS (∼ 90%) would be better off with intensive medical therapy than with intervention.
AB - Introduction: With more intensive medical therapy, the risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) is now below the risk of carotid endarterectomy or stenting (intervention); ∼ 90% of patients would be better with only medical therapy. It is important, therefore, to have methods to identify the ∼ 10% of patients who stand to benefit from intervention. Areas covered: We review the evidence that the risk of asymptomatic stenosis is now below the risk of intervention, and evidence for several approaches to identifying high-risk ACS: transcranial Doppler embolus detection, echolucency and neovascularity on ultrasound, ulceration on three-dimensional ultrasound, plaque composition on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), plaque inflammation on positron emission tomography and assessment of cerebral blood flow reserve. Expert opinion: Carotid endarterectomy or stenting should be performed only in patients with ACS if they have microemboli on transcranial Doppler, three or more ulcers detected on three-dimensional ultrasound or other features of unstable plaque such as plaque echolucency on ultrasound, intraplaque hemorrhage detected on MRI, inflamed plaques detected on PET/CT or reduced cerebral blood flow reserve. Most patients with ACS (∼ 90%) would be better off with intensive medical therapy than with intervention.
KW - Asymptomatic carotid stenosis
KW - High risk
KW - MRI
KW - PET/CT
KW - Three-dimensional ultrasound
KW - Transcranial Doppler microemboli
KW - Ulceration
KW - Vulnerable plaque
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858065040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858065040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1517/17530059.2012.662954
DO - 10.1517/17530059.2012.662954
M3 - Review article
C2 - 23480656
AN - SCOPUS:84858065040
SN - 1753-0059
VL - 6
SP - 139
EP - 151
JO - Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics
JF - Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics
IS - 2
ER -