TY - JOUR
T1 - Hyperprogressive NSCLC With Two Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors
AU - Kasparian, Saro
AU - Gentille, Cesar
AU - Burns, Ethan
AU - Bernicker, Eric H.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the patient and his family for allowing them to write this case report. The authors would also like to thank the radiology department at the Houston Methodist Hospital for their help in reviewing the imaging findings. Dr. Kasparian provided substantial contributions to the conception and design of the manuscript, chart review, literature search, drafting the article, and revising it critically for important intellectual content. Dr. Gentille provided substantial contributions to the conception and design of the manuscript, chart review, literature search, drafting the article, and revising it critically for important intellectual content. Dr. Burns provided substantial contributions to chart review, literature search, drafting the article, and revising it critically for important intellectual content. Dr. Bernicker provided substantial contributions to the conception and design of the manuscript, literature search, drafting the article, and revising it critically for important intellectual content. All the authors approved of the final version to be published.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - Introduction: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are transforming the modern era of cancer therapy. As new treatment options are becoming available, new patterns of disease behavior are manifesting. One such phenomenon, known as hyperprogressive disease (HPD), is a rare complication resulting in exponential disease progression on exposure to an ICI. Herein, we report an uncommon case of a patient who experienced HPD on 2 different occasions with 2 different immunotherapy agents. Case Presentation: A 77-year-old black man was diagnosed with stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. He was enrolled in a clinical trial that involved viral transduction and stereotactic body radiation followed by pembrolizumab administration. His disease progressed markedly after the first cycle of immunotherapy. He was switched to carboplatin and protein-bound paclitaxel. He continued to have steady disease progression. After the third cycle of chemotherapy, he was again given immunotherapy, this time with atezolizumab. Again, after a single infusion, he exhibited substantial disease progression and further clinical deterioration. Conclusions: HPD is a rare yet disturbing complication of immunotherapy with devastating effects on morbidity and mortality. Although there is accumulating literature supporting the phenomenon of HPD, to our knowledge, this is the first reported case of HPD occurring with 2 different ICIs in the same patient. This case suggests that the presence of HPD during treatment with 1 checkpoint inhibitor may preclude the use of another one. It also raises concerns about using other forms of immunomodulating agents. As immunotherapy becomes a major form of cancer therapy, more data are needed to better understand HPD and determine which patients are at risk.
AB - Introduction: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are transforming the modern era of cancer therapy. As new treatment options are becoming available, new patterns of disease behavior are manifesting. One such phenomenon, known as hyperprogressive disease (HPD), is a rare complication resulting in exponential disease progression on exposure to an ICI. Herein, we report an uncommon case of a patient who experienced HPD on 2 different occasions with 2 different immunotherapy agents. Case Presentation: A 77-year-old black man was diagnosed with stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. He was enrolled in a clinical trial that involved viral transduction and stereotactic body radiation followed by pembrolizumab administration. His disease progressed markedly after the first cycle of immunotherapy. He was switched to carboplatin and protein-bound paclitaxel. He continued to have steady disease progression. After the third cycle of chemotherapy, he was again given immunotherapy, this time with atezolizumab. Again, after a single infusion, he exhibited substantial disease progression and further clinical deterioration. Conclusions: HPD is a rare yet disturbing complication of immunotherapy with devastating effects on morbidity and mortality. Although there is accumulating literature supporting the phenomenon of HPD, to our knowledge, this is the first reported case of HPD occurring with 2 different ICIs in the same patient. This case suggests that the presence of HPD during treatment with 1 checkpoint inhibitor may preclude the use of another one. It also raises concerns about using other forms of immunomodulating agents. As immunotherapy becomes a major form of cancer therapy, more data are needed to better understand HPD and determine which patients are at risk.
KW - Atezolizumab
KW - Hyperprogressive disease
KW - Immunotherapy
KW - Non−small cell lung cancer
KW - Pembrolizumab
KW - Stage IV
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109500896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85109500896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100017
DO - 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100017
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85109500896
SN - 2666-3643
VL - 1
JO - JTO Clinical and Research Reports
JF - JTO Clinical and Research Reports
IS - 2
M1 - 100017
ER -