How to review a clinical research paper?

Neel K. Patel, Marco Yeung, Kanto Nagai, Volker Musahl

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Critical evaluation of each section of a paper is needed in order to properly assess the purpose and quality of the paper and to understand the degree to which the results can influence clinical practice. Reviewing a paper is a skill that is best honed by practice, but there is no real formal training during medical school or residency on what to evaluate during a review and what the review process involves for a journal. Thus, this chapter will highlight the major points to review in each section of a paper and will provide a guide for young investigators to use while interpreting the findings of a paper. Additionally, the components of a review submission to a journal will be outlined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationBasic Methods Handbook for Clinical Orthopaedic Research
Subtitle of host publicationA Practical Guide and Case Based Research Approach
PublisherSpringer Berlin Heidelberg
Pages255-262
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)9783662582541
ISBN (Print)9783662582534
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Keywords

  • Peer review
  • Publication
  • Reviewer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to review a clinical research paper?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this