TY - JOUR
T1 - How Happy Is Too Happy? Euphoria, Neuroethics, and Deep Brain Stimulation of the Nucleus Accumbens
AU - Synofzik, Matthis
AU - Schlaepfer, Thomas E.
AU - Fins, Joseph J.
N1 - Funding Information:
T. Schlaepfer and J. Fins are members of the project group “Deep Brain Stimulation in Psychiatry: Guidance for Responsible Research and Application,” funded by the Volkswagen Stiftung (Hannover, Germany). M. Synofzik also received funds from the Volkswagen Stiftung (Az.: II/85158). We thank the anonymous reviewers for their important comments that helped to advance this work. Address correspondence to Dr. Matthis Synofzik, Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]
Copyright:
Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/1
Y1 - 2012/1
N2 - Recent studies on deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the nucleus accumbens (NA)-a center of the brain well known to mediate reward, pleasure, and addiction-have provided proof of principle evidence that DBS might be able to induce euphoria in a rapid, well-modulated manner, with potentially much higher efficacy than previous neuropsychiatric interventions. This development evokes two lines of fundamental ethical questions: If happiness were indeed easily inducible by a button press, are there any ethical, psychological, or social limits of DBS-induced happiness? If happiness might be easily inducible not just in persons suffering from psychiatric disease, but also in healthy persons, are there any intrinsic objections against such an enhancement use of DBS? This study uses systematic ethical analysis of recent observations in NA DBS, illustrated by a case vignette and by published reports on other patients. It was found that the benefit of DBS-induced modulation of affective and motivational states comes in degrees: A change in the DBS settings can transform a salutary state of hedonia into a hypomanic or manic state and turn an enhanced affective state into a maladaptive one. Thus, DBS-induced happiness requires an individual, domain-specific functional analysis, which might reveal context-dependent beneficial and detrimental consequences for a person's life. These consequences warrant careful observation of mood states in persons with NA DBS. There are no convincing intrinsic objections against an enhancement use of DBS. However, the lack of evidence about potential benefits, the risk of severe harm, and the high intervention costs currently pose important extrinsic arguments against use of DBS for enhancement purposes.
AB - Recent studies on deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the nucleus accumbens (NA)-a center of the brain well known to mediate reward, pleasure, and addiction-have provided proof of principle evidence that DBS might be able to induce euphoria in a rapid, well-modulated manner, with potentially much higher efficacy than previous neuropsychiatric interventions. This development evokes two lines of fundamental ethical questions: If happiness were indeed easily inducible by a button press, are there any ethical, psychological, or social limits of DBS-induced happiness? If happiness might be easily inducible not just in persons suffering from psychiatric disease, but also in healthy persons, are there any intrinsic objections against such an enhancement use of DBS? This study uses systematic ethical analysis of recent observations in NA DBS, illustrated by a case vignette and by published reports on other patients. It was found that the benefit of DBS-induced modulation of affective and motivational states comes in degrees: A change in the DBS settings can transform a salutary state of hedonia into a hypomanic or manic state and turn an enhanced affective state into a maladaptive one. Thus, DBS-induced happiness requires an individual, domain-specific functional analysis, which might reveal context-dependent beneficial and detrimental consequences for a person's life. These consequences warrant careful observation of mood states in persons with NA DBS. There are no convincing intrinsic objections against an enhancement use of DBS. However, the lack of evidence about potential benefits, the risk of severe harm, and the high intervention costs currently pose important extrinsic arguments against use of DBS for enhancement purposes.
KW - addiction
KW - deep brain stimulation
KW - enhancement
KW - ethics
KW - major depression
KW - obsessive compulsive disorder
KW - psychiatry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855943350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855943350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/21507740.2011.635633
DO - 10.1080/21507740.2011.635633
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84855943350
SN - 2150-7740
VL - 3
SP - 30
EP - 36
JO - AJOB Neuroscience
JF - AJOB Neuroscience
IS - 1
ER -