Homicide Manner-of-Death Classification in Arrest-Related Death

Mark W. Kroll, Dwayne A. Wolf, J. Celia Cobb, Tasha Z. Greenberg, Sebastian N. Kunz, James E. Brewer, Howard E. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Multiple studies have documented various factors that influence or determine forensic pathologist classification of manner of death. There do not appear to be any published studies on manner of death classification specifically regarding arrest-related deaths (ARDs). The goal of this study was to consider a large body of cases of nonfirearm ARDs to analyze the homicide classification with regards to numerous decedent and practitioner (medical examiner/coroner [ME/C]) variables. We analyzed 1145 US autopsy reports from the years 2006-2020, inclusive, and considered decedent variables of age, ethnicity, height, weight, body mass index, toxicology, and mention of a conducted electrical weapon and ME/C influence variables of gender, country region, and year. We found that the homicide classification likelihood increased by a factor of 1.04-1.05 per year, 1.34-1.37 for a female medical examiner, and 1.4-1.5 going from Southern states to Western states. There is an increasing trend for ME/C to label nonfirearm ARDs as homicides in the United States. The homicide classification is more common in Western states and less common in Southern states, and it was more common with a female ME/C.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-110
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2024

Keywords

  • arrest-related death
  • forensic pathology
  • homicide
  • in-custody death
  • manner of death
  • police

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Homicide Manner-of-Death Classification in Arrest-Related Death'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this