Abstract
A new grading system for adenocarcinoma of the prostate (MDAH System) and its simplified version, both based on the percentage of tumor that is differentiated (gland-forming) or undifferentiated (non-gland-forming), were compared with the grading systems of Mostofi and Gleason. In a study group of 182 patients with Stage C adenocarcinoma of the prostate, the MDAH system identified 84 patients (46%) as Grade 1, 75 (41%) as Grade 2-3, and 23 (13%) as Grade 4. Kaplan-Meier survival curves predicted a 91% five-year survival for Grade 1 patients, a 60% 5-year survival for Grade 2-3 patients, and a 15% five-year survival for Grade 4 patients. Wilcoxon (Gehan modification) tests showed that the survival was significantly different among Grades 1, 2-3, and 4. The MDAH System is an improvement over other grading systems in that it is a simple, low-power microscopic method that depends only on the percentage of gland formation in the tumor and further reflects the biologic behavior of the tumor as measured by the patient's survival.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 525-532 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Cancer |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 1 1982 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Oncology
- Cancer Research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Histologic grading study of prostate adenocarcinoma: The development of a new system and comparison with other methods—A preliminary study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS