Head-to-head comparison of 11C-PBR28 and 18F-GE180 for quantification of the translocator protein in the human brain

Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara, Belen Pascual, Gaia Rizzo, Meixiang Yu, Neha Pal, David Beers, Randall Carter, Stanley H. Appel, Nazem Atassi, Joseph C. Masdeu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

18F-GE180 is a third-generation PET tracer for quantifying the translocator protein (TSPO), a biomarker for inflammation. The aim of this study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of 18F-GE180 and the well-established TSPO tracer 11C-PBR28 by scanning with both tracers during the same day in the same subjects. Methods: Five subjects underwent a 90-min PET scan with 11C-PBR28 in the morning and 18F-GE180 in the afternoon. A metabolite-corrected arterial input function was obtained in each subject for both tracers, and the brain uptake was quantified with a 2-tissue-compartment model. Results: The rate of metabolism of 18F-GE180 in arterial blood was slower than that of 11C-PBR28 (the percentages of nonmetabolized parent in plasma at 90min were 74.9%± 4.15%[mean ± SD] and 11.2% ± 1.90%, respectively). The plasma free fractions were similar for both tracers: 3.5% ± 1.1%for 18F-GE180 and 4.1%± 1.1% for 11C-PBR28. The average total volume of distribution (VT) of 18F-GE180 was about 20 times smaller than that of 11C-PBR28 (0.15 ± 0.03 mL/cm3 for 18F-GE180 and 3.27 ± 0.66 mL/cm3 for 11C-PBR28). 18F-GE180 was characterized by poor transfer from the vascular compartment to the brain (its plasma-to-tissue rate constant [K1] was about 10 times smaller than that of 11C-PBR28). Moreover, kinetic modeling was more difficult with 18F-GE180, as its VT values were identified with a lower precision than those of 11CPBR28 and outlying values were more frequent. Conclusion: The VT of 18F-GE180 was about 20 times smaller than that of 11C-PBR28 because of low penetration into the brain from the vascular compartment. In addition, kinetic modeling of 18F-GE180 was more challenging than that of 11C-PBR28. Therefore, compared with 11C-PBR28, 18F-GE180 had unfavorable characteristics for TSPO imaging of the brain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1260-1266
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Nuclear Medicine
Volume59
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Keywords

  • C-PBR28
  • F-GE180
  • TSPO

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Head-to-head comparison of <sup>11</sup>C-PBR28 and <sup>18</sup>F-GE180 for quantification of the translocator protein in the human brain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this