Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Harmonizing visual readings of tau PET tracers - the HEAD study

Emma Ruppert, Marina Scop Medeiros, Marie R. Vermeiren, Andreia Rocha, Carolina Soares, Pamela C.L. Ferreira, Livia Amaral, Guilherme Povala, Guilherme Bauer-Negrini, Firoza Z. Lussier, Markley Silva Oliveira, Matheus Scarpatto Rodrigues, Rayan Mroué, Bruna Bellaver, Rik Ossenkoppele, Elsmarieke van de Giessen, Joseph C. Masdeu, Dana L. Tudorascu, David N. Soleimani-Meigooni, Juan ForteaVal J. Lowe, Hwamee Oh, Belen Pascual, Brian A. Gordon, Pedro Rosa-Neto, Suzanne L. Baker, Tharick A. Pascoal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tau-PET provides critical topographic information on tau deposition in the living brain. Integrating research-based practices into clinical settings through qualitative methods, such as visual reads, is becoming increasingly important. This study aims to compare the performance of existing visual reading methods for [18F]Flortaucipir (FTP) and [18F]MK-6240 (MK) and provide preliminary data toward a unified visual reading approach for all tau-PET tracers using a head-to-head dataset. METHODS: The study design and development plans are illustrated in Figure 1. To evaluate previously published visual reading methods, two blinded raters conducted FTP and MK visual reads on 340 participants from the HEAD study. A unified visual reading method was developed and tested on 101 participants, using a composite of adjusted Braak regions to determine 3 stages of severity while harmonizing between tracers. For external validation, the method will be tested on four additional cohorts, each using one of the following tracers: FTP, MK, PI, or RO. RESULTS: Inter-rater agreement using previous methods (Figure 2A) showed high Cohen's kappa values (0.71-0.77) for the low and high tau burden categories in both FTP and MK visual reads. However, agreement was substantially lower in the non-AD-like category, leading to overall agreement rates of 0.55 for FTP and 0.69 for MK. In contrast, the method developed here improved inter-rater agreement across all categories (0.87-0.96) and introduced a moderate tau (0.79-0.83) burden group (Figure 2B), leading to higher overall agreement rates of 0.81 for FTP and 0.87 for MK (Figure 2C). For inter-tracer agreement (Figure 3), previous methods resulted in discordant visual reads for FTP and MK in 34.4% of cases for rater 1 and 24.7% for rater 2. The developed method reduced this disagreement to 11.9% (rater 1) and 15.8% (rater 2), demonstrating improved consistency across different tracers. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that previously published visual reading methods produced varying classifications depending on the tracer used. The method proposed here improved inter-rater and inter-tracer visual read agreements by developing a unified, tracer-agnostic approach easy to be used. Importantly, this clinician-friendly method has the potential for widespread adoption, offering a single harmonized visual reading technique for all tau-PET tracers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere110845
JournalAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
Volume21
Issue numberS8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2025

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Health Policy
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Harmonizing visual readings of tau PET tracers - the HEAD study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this