TY - JOUR
T1 - Financial Toxicity Following Surgical Treatment for Breast Cancer
T2 - A Cross-sectional Pilot Study
AU - Offodile, Anaeze C.
AU - Asaad, Malke
AU - Boukovalas, Stefanos
AU - Bailey, Chad
AU - Lin, Yu Li
AU - Teshome, Mediget
AU - Greenup, Rachel A.
AU - Butler, Charles
N1 - Funding Information:
The lead author (ACO) has received research funding from the Blue Cross Blue Shield Affordability Cures Consortium and National Academy of Medicine that are unrelated to the submitted work. He is also a board member of the Patient Advocate Foundation.
Funding Information:
This research was generously supported by funds from the University Cancer Foundation via the Sister Institution Network Fund at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Acknowledgement
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Society of Surgical Oncology.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Background: Despite growing national attention, there is limited understanding of the patient- and treatment-level characteristics related to treatment cost-associated distress (“financial toxicity”) in breast cancer patients. Our aim is to identify risk factors for financial toxicity amongst breast cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment. Methods: This is a single-institution cross-sectional survey of adult female breast cancer patients who underwent lumpectomy or mastectomy between January 2018 and June 2019. Financial toxicity was measured via the 11-item comprehensive score for financial toxicity (COST) instrument. Responses were linked with data on patient demographics and clinical history abstracted from the corresponding medical record. Multivariate regression was used to identify patient- and treatment-level factors associated with worsening financial toxicity. Secondary outcome measures included self-reported coping strategies for high treatment costs. Results: A total of 571 patients were included; overall, these individuals were mostly white (76.0%), in-state residents (72.3%), and married (73.0%). Following multivariate analysis, lower financial distress was associated with the use of supplemental insurance, increasing annual household income, and a higher credit score (score > 740). Conversely, work reduction or cessation, increased out-of-pocket spending, advanced tumor stage, and being employed at the time of diagnosis were associated with increased financial distress. Patients with higher reported financial distress were more likely to decrease their spending on food, clothing, and leisure activities. Conclusions: Financial toxicity was associated with baseline demographic, disease, and treatment characteristics in our cohort of insured patients. These characteristics may be critical opportunities for interventions related to financial navigation along the treatment continuum.
AB - Background: Despite growing national attention, there is limited understanding of the patient- and treatment-level characteristics related to treatment cost-associated distress (“financial toxicity”) in breast cancer patients. Our aim is to identify risk factors for financial toxicity amongst breast cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment. Methods: This is a single-institution cross-sectional survey of adult female breast cancer patients who underwent lumpectomy or mastectomy between January 2018 and June 2019. Financial toxicity was measured via the 11-item comprehensive score for financial toxicity (COST) instrument. Responses were linked with data on patient demographics and clinical history abstracted from the corresponding medical record. Multivariate regression was used to identify patient- and treatment-level factors associated with worsening financial toxicity. Secondary outcome measures included self-reported coping strategies for high treatment costs. Results: A total of 571 patients were included; overall, these individuals were mostly white (76.0%), in-state residents (72.3%), and married (73.0%). Following multivariate analysis, lower financial distress was associated with the use of supplemental insurance, increasing annual household income, and a higher credit score (score > 740). Conversely, work reduction or cessation, increased out-of-pocket spending, advanced tumor stage, and being employed at the time of diagnosis were associated with increased financial distress. Patients with higher reported financial distress were more likely to decrease their spending on food, clothing, and leisure activities. Conclusions: Financial toxicity was associated with baseline demographic, disease, and treatment characteristics in our cohort of insured patients. These characteristics may be critical opportunities for interventions related to financial navigation along the treatment continuum.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092440710&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092440710&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-020-09216-9
DO - 10.1245/s10434-020-09216-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 33051742
AN - SCOPUS:85092440710
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 28
SP - 2451
EP - 2462
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 5
ER -