TY - JOUR
T1 - Final outcomes of escalated melphalan 280 mg/m 2 with amifostine cytoprotection followed autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma
T2 - high CR and VGPR rates do not translate into improved survival
AU - Hari, Parameswaran
AU - Reece, Donna E.
AU - Randhawa, Jasleen
AU - Flomenberg, Neal
AU - Howard, Dianna S.
AU - Badros, Ashrof Z.
AU - Rapoport, Aaron P.
AU - Meisenberg, Barry R.
AU - Filicko-Ohara, Joanne
AU - Phillips, Gordon L.
AU - Vesole, David H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019/2/1
Y1 - 2019/2/1
N2 - The most common preparative regimen for autologous transplantation (ASCT) in myeloma (MM) consists of melphalan 200 mg/m 2 (MEL 200). Higher doses of melphalan 220–260 mg/m 2 , although relatively well tolerated, have not shown significant improvement in clinical outcomes. Several approaches have been pursued in the past to improve CR rates, including poly-chemotherapy preparative regimens, tandem ASCT, consolidation, and/or maintenance therapy. Since there is a steep dose–response effect for intravenous melphalan, we evaluated an alternative single ASCT strategy using higher-dose melphalan at 280 mg/m 2 (MEL 280) with amifostine as a cytoprotectant as the maximum tolerated dose determined in an earlier phase I dose escalation trial. We report the final long-term outcomes of MM patients who underwent conditioning with MEL 280 with amifostine cytoprotection followed by ASCT. Although the complete response rate was quite high in the era pre-dating the routine use of novel therapies (proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents) (49%), the progression-free survival was a disappointing 22 months. The implications of this dichotomy between the excellent depth of ASCT response and progression-free survival are discussed.
AB - The most common preparative regimen for autologous transplantation (ASCT) in myeloma (MM) consists of melphalan 200 mg/m 2 (MEL 200). Higher doses of melphalan 220–260 mg/m 2 , although relatively well tolerated, have not shown significant improvement in clinical outcomes. Several approaches have been pursued in the past to improve CR rates, including poly-chemotherapy preparative regimens, tandem ASCT, consolidation, and/or maintenance therapy. Since there is a steep dose–response effect for intravenous melphalan, we evaluated an alternative single ASCT strategy using higher-dose melphalan at 280 mg/m 2 (MEL 280) with amifostine as a cytoprotectant as the maximum tolerated dose determined in an earlier phase I dose escalation trial. We report the final long-term outcomes of MM patients who underwent conditioning with MEL 280 with amifostine cytoprotection followed by ASCT. Although the complete response rate was quite high in the era pre-dating the routine use of novel therapies (proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents) (49%), the progression-free survival was a disappointing 22 months. The implications of this dichotomy between the excellent depth of ASCT response and progression-free survival are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048569397&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048569397&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41409-018-0261-y
DO - 10.1038/s41409-018-0261-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 29907806
AN - SCOPUS:85048569397
VL - 54
SP - 293
EP - 299
JO - Bone Marrow Transplantation
JF - Bone Marrow Transplantation
SN - 0268-3369
IS - 2
ER -