TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility and exploratory efficacy evaluation of the embrella embolic deflector system for the prevention of cerebral emboli in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
T2 - The PROTAVI-C pilot study
AU - Rodés-Cabau, Josep
AU - Kahlert, Philip
AU - Neumann, Franz Josef
AU - Schymik, Gerhard
AU - Webb, John G.
AU - Amarenco, Pierre
AU - Brott, Thomas
AU - Garami, Zsolt
AU - Gerosa, Gino
AU - Lefèvre, Thierry
AU - Plicht, Bjoern
AU - Pocock, Stuart J.
AU - Schlamann, Marc
AU - Thomas, Martyn
AU - Diamond, Beverly
AU - Merioua, Ihsen
AU - Beyersdorf, Friedhelm
AU - Vahanian, Alec
N1 - Funding Information:
The PROTAVI-C Pilot Study was supported by Edwards Lifesciences . Dr. Rodés-Cabau is a consultant for and has received research grants from Edwards Lifesciences . Dr. Kahlert is a clinical proctor and consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Neumann has received institutional grants and speaker honoraria and travel support from Edwards Lifesciences . Dr. Schymik is a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences. Drs. Webb, Brott, and Garami are consultants for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Gerosa has received speaker honoraria from St. Jude Medical and HeartWare. Dr. Lefevre is a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences; and has received minor fees from Direct Flow Medical and Symetis. Dr. Plicht has received honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences; and travel support and speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular Dr. Thomas is a proctor and consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Vahanian has received speaker’s fees from Edwards Lifesciences; and is on the Advisory Boards of Abbott and Valtech. Drs. Merioua and Diamond are employees of Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation Published by Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2014/10/1
Y1 - 2014/10/1
N2 - Conclusions This study showed the feasibility and safety of using the EED system in TAVR procedures. The EED system did not prevent the occurrence of cerebral microemboli during TAVR or new transient ischemic lesions as evaluated by DW-MRI, but it was associated with a reduction in lesion volume. Further studies are warranted to determine the efficacy of using the EED system during TAVR procedures.Objectives This study sought to determine the feasibility, safety, and exploratory efficacy of the Embrella Embolic Deflector (EED) system (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).Background Few data exist on the value of using embolic protection devices during TAVR.Methods This pilot study included 52 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR. The EED system was used in 41 patients, whereas 11 patients underwent TAVR without embolic protection (control group). Cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) was performed at baseline and within 7 days and 30 days after TAVR.Results The EED system was successfully deployed at the level of the aortic arch in all patients with no complications. The deployment of the EED system was associated with high-intensity transient signals (HITS) as evaluated by transcranial Doppler (median: 48 [interquartile range: 17 to 198] HITS), and a higher total number of HITS was observed in the EED group (p < 0.001 vs. control group). DW-MRI performed within 7 days after TAVR showed the presence of new ischemic lesions in all patients in both groups, with a median number of 7 (interquartile range: 3 to 13) lesions per patient. The use of the EED system was associated with a lower lesion volume compared with the control group (p = 0.003). All new cerebral lesions had disappeared on the DW-MRI performed at 30 days after TAVR. Two strokes unrelated to the EED system occurred 2 and 29 days after TAVR.
AB - Conclusions This study showed the feasibility and safety of using the EED system in TAVR procedures. The EED system did not prevent the occurrence of cerebral microemboli during TAVR or new transient ischemic lesions as evaluated by DW-MRI, but it was associated with a reduction in lesion volume. Further studies are warranted to determine the efficacy of using the EED system during TAVR procedures.Objectives This study sought to determine the feasibility, safety, and exploratory efficacy of the Embrella Embolic Deflector (EED) system (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).Background Few data exist on the value of using embolic protection devices during TAVR.Methods This pilot study included 52 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR. The EED system was used in 41 patients, whereas 11 patients underwent TAVR without embolic protection (control group). Cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) was performed at baseline and within 7 days and 30 days after TAVR.Results The EED system was successfully deployed at the level of the aortic arch in all patients with no complications. The deployment of the EED system was associated with high-intensity transient signals (HITS) as evaluated by transcranial Doppler (median: 48 [interquartile range: 17 to 198] HITS), and a higher total number of HITS was observed in the EED group (p < 0.001 vs. control group). DW-MRI performed within 7 days after TAVR showed the presence of new ischemic lesions in all patients in both groups, with a median number of 7 (interquartile range: 3 to 13) lesions per patient. The use of the EED system was associated with a lower lesion volume compared with the control group (p = 0.003). All new cerebral lesions had disappeared on the DW-MRI performed at 30 days after TAVR. Two strokes unrelated to the EED system occurred 2 and 29 days after TAVR.
KW - embolic protection
KW - Embrella Embolic Deflector
KW - magnetic resonance imaging
KW - transcatheter aortic valve implantation
KW - transcranial Doppler
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908164006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908164006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.019
DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 25341709
AN - SCOPUS:84908164006
VL - 7
SP - 1146
EP - 1155
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
SN - 1936-8798
IS - 10
ER -