TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors affecting patients' pain intensity during in office intravitreal injection procedure
AU - Rifkin, Lana
AU - Schaal, Shlomit
PY - 2012/4
Y1 - 2012/4
N2 - PURPOSE: To determine factors associated with patients' comfort during routine in-office intravitreal injection. METHODS: Sixty patients receiving intravitreal injections over 15 months for macular edema because of diabetes, age-related macular degeneration, or retinal vein occlusion who were randomized into 3 groups to receive 1 of 3 commonly used forms of anesthesia-TetraVisc, proparacaine HCl, or tetracaine HCl-before receiving intravitreal injection were studied. Fifteen minutes after injection, patients were asked to rate their pain from 0 (no pain/no distress) to 10 (agonizing pain/unbearable distress) using a Visual Analog Pain score survey. Self-reported pain scores were stratified by age, gender, diagnosis, injection number, substance injected, needle gauge, and visual acuity improvement. RESULTS: Intravitreal injection was associated with low pain scores. Patients receiving tetracaine reported a statistically significant lower pain score (3.05 ± 2.01) than patients receiving proparacaine (3.17 ± 2.18) or TetraVisc (3.3 9± 2.26; P < 0.01). Other important factors influencing pain score significantly (P < 0.01) included improved vision from previous injection, female sex, and age >65 years. Pain scores decreased with each consecutive injection. CONCLUSION: Pain associated with intravitreal injection is generally mild, and may be associated with epidemiologic and environmental factors.
AB - PURPOSE: To determine factors associated with patients' comfort during routine in-office intravitreal injection. METHODS: Sixty patients receiving intravitreal injections over 15 months for macular edema because of diabetes, age-related macular degeneration, or retinal vein occlusion who were randomized into 3 groups to receive 1 of 3 commonly used forms of anesthesia-TetraVisc, proparacaine HCl, or tetracaine HCl-before receiving intravitreal injection were studied. Fifteen minutes after injection, patients were asked to rate their pain from 0 (no pain/no distress) to 10 (agonizing pain/unbearable distress) using a Visual Analog Pain score survey. Self-reported pain scores were stratified by age, gender, diagnosis, injection number, substance injected, needle gauge, and visual acuity improvement. RESULTS: Intravitreal injection was associated with low pain scores. Patients receiving tetracaine reported a statistically significant lower pain score (3.05 ± 2.01) than patients receiving proparacaine (3.17 ± 2.18) or TetraVisc (3.3 9± 2.26; P < 0.01). Other important factors influencing pain score significantly (P < 0.01) included improved vision from previous injection, female sex, and age >65 years. Pain scores decreased with each consecutive injection. CONCLUSION: Pain associated with intravitreal injection is generally mild, and may be associated with epidemiologic and environmental factors.
KW - intravitreal injection
KW - pain
KW - topical anesthesia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859105895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859105895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182252ad3
DO - 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182252ad3
M3 - Article
C2 - 22082694
AN - SCOPUS:84859105895
VL - 32
SP - 696
EP - 700
JO - Retina
JF - Retina
SN - 0275-004X
IS - 4
ER -