TY - JOUR
T1 - Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures
AU - Fazel, Reza
AU - Krumholz, Harlan M.
AU - Wang, Yongfei
AU - Ross, Joseph S.
AU - Chen, Jersey
AU - Ting, Henry H.
AU - Shah, Nilay D.
AU - Nasir, Khurram
AU - Einstein, Andrew J.
AU - Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2009/8/27
Y1 - 2009/8/27
N2 - BACKGROUND: The growing use of imaging procedures in the United States has raised concerns about exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation in the general population. METHODS: We identified 952,420 nonelderly adults (between 18 and 64 years of age) in five health care markets across the United States between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007. Utilization data were used to estimate cumulative effective doses of radiation from imaging procedures and to calculate population-based rates of exposure, with annual effective doses defined as low (≤3 mSv), moderate (>3 to 20 mSv), high (>20 to 50 mSv), or very high (>50 mSv). RESULTS: During the study period, 655,613 enrollees (68.8%) underwent at least one imaging procedure associated with radiation exposure. The mean (±SD) cumulative effective dose from imaging procedures was 2.4±6.0 mSv per enrollee per year; however, a wide distribution was noted, with a median effective dose of 0.1 mSv per enrollee per year (interquartile range, 0.0 to 1.7). Overall, moderate effective doses of radiation were incurred in 193.8 enrollees per 1000 per year, whereas high and very high doses were incurred in 18.6 and 1.9 enrollees per 1000 per year, respectively. In general, cumulative effective doses of radiation from imaging procedures increased with advancing age and were higher in women than in men. Computed tomographic and nuclear imaging accounted for 75.4% of the cumulative effective dose, with 81.8% of the total administered in outpatient settings. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging procedures are an important source of exposure to ionizing radiation in the United States and can result in high cumulative effective doses of radiation.
AB - BACKGROUND: The growing use of imaging procedures in the United States has raised concerns about exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation in the general population. METHODS: We identified 952,420 nonelderly adults (between 18 and 64 years of age) in five health care markets across the United States between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007. Utilization data were used to estimate cumulative effective doses of radiation from imaging procedures and to calculate population-based rates of exposure, with annual effective doses defined as low (≤3 mSv), moderate (>3 to 20 mSv), high (>20 to 50 mSv), or very high (>50 mSv). RESULTS: During the study period, 655,613 enrollees (68.8%) underwent at least one imaging procedure associated with radiation exposure. The mean (±SD) cumulative effective dose from imaging procedures was 2.4±6.0 mSv per enrollee per year; however, a wide distribution was noted, with a median effective dose of 0.1 mSv per enrollee per year (interquartile range, 0.0 to 1.7). Overall, moderate effective doses of radiation were incurred in 193.8 enrollees per 1000 per year, whereas high and very high doses were incurred in 18.6 and 1.9 enrollees per 1000 per year, respectively. In general, cumulative effective doses of radiation from imaging procedures increased with advancing age and were higher in women than in men. Computed tomographic and nuclear imaging accounted for 75.4% of the cumulative effective dose, with 81.8% of the total administered in outpatient settings. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging procedures are an important source of exposure to ionizing radiation in the United States and can result in high cumulative effective doses of radiation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69349096036&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69349096036&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa0901249
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa0901249
M3 - Article
C2 - 19710483
AN - SCOPUS:69349096036
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 361
SP - 849
EP - 857
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 9
ER -