Evaluation of patients with hepatocellular carcinomas that do not produce α-fetoprotein

Vatche G. Agopian, Michael P. Harlander-Locke, Daniela Markovic, Ali Zarrinpar, Fady M. Kaldas, Elaine Y. Cheng, Hasan Yersiz, Douglas G. Farmer, Jonathan R. Hiatt, Ronaldw Busuttil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

62 Scopus citations

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) is a biomarker for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) associated with a more aggressive tumor phenotype and inferior outcomes after a liver transplant (LT).Data on the outcomes for patients with HCCs that do not produce AFP are limited. OBJECTIVE To compare characteristics and outcomes among LT recipients with radiographically apparent HCC lesions with AFP-producing tumors or with tumors that do not produce AFP (hereafter referred to as non-AFP-producing tumors), and to identify factors influencing recurrence in LT recipients with non-AFP-producing tumors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective analysis at a university transplant center of 665 adults with HCC who underwent an LT during the period from 1989 to 2013. Of the 665 LT recipients, 457 (68.7%) had AFP-producing tumors, and 208 (31.3%) had non-AFP-producing tumors (the maximum AFP level before an LT was 10 ng/mL). Dates of study analysis were from August 2015 to June 2016. INTERVENTION Liver transplant. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Recurrence-free survival and recurrence rates. RESULTS Patients with non-AFP-producing tumors had radiographic tumor characteristics similar to those of patients with AFP-producing tumors, but, pathologically, they had fewer lesions (25%vs 35%with >2 lesions; P = .03), smaller cumulative tumor diameters (4.2 vs 5.0 cm; P = .02), fewer microvascular (17%vs 22%) and macrovascular (2%vs 9%) invasions (P < .001), and fewer poorly differentiated tumors (15%vs 28%; P < .001). Patients with non-AFP-producing tumors also had significantly superior recurrence-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years (88%, 74%, and 67%vs 76%, 59%, and 51%, respectively; P = .002) and lower 5-year recurrence rates (8.8% vs 22%; P < .001) than patients with AFP-producing tumors. When stratified by radiologic Milan criteria, 5-year survival was better, and recurrence lowest, among patients with non-AFP-producing tumors within the Milan criteria (71%survival and 6%recurrence), and survival was worse, and recurrence highest, for patients with AFP-producing tumors outside the Milan criteria (40% survival and 42%recurrence; P < .001). Significant predictors of recurrence among patients with non-AFP-producing tumors include radiologic (>2 tumors [HR, 4.98; 95%CI, 1.72-14.4; P = .003]; cumulative diameter [1.70 per log SD; 1.12-2.59; P < .001]; outside the Milan criteria [10.0; 3.7-33.3; P < .001) and pathologic factors (>2 tumors [4.39; 1.32-14.6; P = .02]; cumulative diameter [2.32 per log SD; 1.43-3.77; P = .001]; microvascular [3.07; 1.02-9.24; P = .05] and macrovascular invasion [8.75; 2.15-35.6; P = .002]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Nearly one-Third of patients with radiographically apparent HCC have non-AFP-producing tumors that have more favorable pathologic characteristics, lower posttransplant recurrence, and superior survival compared with patients with AFP-producing tumors. Posttransplant HCC recurrence for patients with non-AFP-producing tumors is predicted by important radiologic and pathologic factors, and is negligible for patients within the Milan criteria. Stratifying patients by AFP status in addition to radiological criteria may improve the selection process for and the prioritization of transplant candidates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-64
Number of pages10
JournalJAMA Surgery
Volume152
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of patients with hepatocellular carcinomas that do not produce α-fetoprotein'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this